ABSTRACT
Introduction Covid-19 has placed an unprecedented demand on healthcare systems worldwide. A positive safety culture is associated with improved patient safety and in turn patient outcomes. To date, no study has evaluated the impact of Covid-19 on safety culture.
Methods The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to investigate safety culture at a large UK teaching hospital during Covid-19. Findings were compared with baseline data from 2017. Incident reporting from the year preceding the pandemic was also examined.
Results Significant increased were seen in SAQ scores of doctors and ‘other clinical staff’, there was no change in the nursing group. During Covid-19, on univariate regression analysis, female gender, age 40-49 years, non-white ethnicity, and nursing job role were all associated with lower SAQ scores. Training and support for redeployment were associated with higher SAQ scores. On multivariate analysis, non-disclosed gender (−0.13), non-disclosed ethnicity (−0.11), nursing role (−0.15), and support (0.29) persisted to significance. A significant decrease (p<0.003) was seen in error reporting after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Discussion This is the first study to report SAQ during Covid-19 and compare with baseline. Differences in SAQ scores were observed during Covid-19 between professional groups and compared to baseline. Reductions in incident reporting were also seen. These changes may reflect perception of risk, changes in volume or nature of work. High-quality support for redeployed staff may be associated with improved safety perception during future pandemics.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT
Safety culture is associated with patient safety and outcomes
This is the first study to investigate safety culture during the Covid-19 pandemic
This study uses the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) and Datix incident reporting data to investigate determinants of safety climate during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Safety climate is context specific, this study is strengthened by the availability of benchmarking data from before the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Significant differences in SAQ scores between professional groups were observed during Covid-19.
Gender, ethnicity and job role were significant determinants of safety attitudes.
Support during redeployment was associated with improved safety attitudes.
The number of incidents that were reported reduced significantly during Covid-19, although the number of events leading to harm remained constant.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Observational study, not a prospective clinical trial
Clinical Protocols
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Odpo1iASbNKS8od4NrmEkh6q2QjpFHfX/view
Funding Statement
No funding was received in support of this paper. Johnson and Johnson have supported the activities of the Pansurg collaborative with an educational grant.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Imperial College Research Ethics Committee Reference:20IC5890
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Competing interests No conflicts to declare
Funding No funding was received in support of this paper. Johnson and Johnson have supported the activities of the PanSurg collaborative with an educational grant.
Patient Participation and Involvement As this was a study of clinical staff, no patient or public involvement was performed in the design of this study. A multidisciplinary group of clinicians was involved in the survey design. Results have been disseminated to the public using a series of free webinars available to view on the PanSurg platform.
Data Sharing All data is available in a de-identified format upon reasonable request to the Imperial College Big Data and Analytical Unit (BDAU) or the corresponding author.
Ethics Ethical approval was obtained from Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ICREC)reference 20IC5890
Data Availability
The data generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
