PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Denning, Max AU - Goh, Ee Teng AU - Scott, Alasdair AU - Martin, Guy AU - Markar, Sheraz AU - Flott, Kelsey AU - Mason, Sam AU - Przybylowicz, Jan AU - Almonte, Melanie AU - Clarke, Jonathan AU - Winter-Beatty, Jasmine AU - Chidambaram, Swathikan AU - Yalamanchili, Seema AU - Tan, Benjamin Yong-Qiang AU - Kanneganti, Abhiram AU - Sounderajah, Viknesh AU - Wells, Mary AU - Purkayastha, Sanjay AU - Kinross, James TI - What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A case study from a large metropolitan teaching hospital AID - 10.1101/2020.06.15.20129080 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.15.20129080 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/17/2020.06.15.20129080.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/17/2020.06.15.20129080.full AB - Introduction Covid-19 has placed an unprecedented demand on healthcare systems worldwide. A positive safety culture is associated with improved patient safety and in turn patient outcomes. To date, no study has evaluated the impact of Covid-19 on safety culture.Methods The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to investigate safety culture at a large UK teaching hospital during Covid-19. Findings were compared with baseline data from 2017. Incident reporting from the year preceding the pandemic was also examined.Results Significant increased were seen in SAQ scores of doctors and ‘other clinical staff’, there was no change in the nursing group. During Covid-19, on univariate regression analysis, female gender, age 40-49 years, non-white ethnicity, and nursing job role were all associated with lower SAQ scores. Training and support for redeployment were associated with higher SAQ scores. On multivariate analysis, non-disclosed gender (−0.13), non-disclosed ethnicity (−0.11), nursing role (−0.15), and support (0.29) persisted to significance. A significant decrease (p<0.003) was seen in error reporting after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.Discussion This is the first study to report SAQ during Covid-19 and compare with baseline. Differences in SAQ scores were observed during Covid-19 between professional groups and compared to baseline. Reductions in incident reporting were also seen. These changes may reflect perception of risk, changes in volume or nature of work. High-quality support for redeployed staff may be associated with improved safety perception during future pandemics.WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THE SUBJECTSafety culture is associated with patient safety and outcomesThis is the first study to investigate safety culture during the Covid-19 pandemicThis study uses the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) and Datix incident reporting data to investigate determinants of safety climate during the Covid-19 pandemic.Safety climate is context specific, this study is strengthened by the availability of benchmarking data from before the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.Significant differences in SAQ scores between professional groups were observed during Covid-19.Gender, ethnicity and job role were significant determinants of safety attitudes.Support during redeployment was associated with improved safety attitudes.The number of incidents that were reported reduced significantly during Covid-19, although the number of events leading to harm remained constant.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialObservational study, not a prospective clinical trialClinical Protocols https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Odpo1iASbNKS8od4NrmEkh6q2QjpFHfX/view Funding StatementNo funding was received in support of this paper. Johnson and Johnson have supported the activities of the Pansurg collaborative with an educational grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Imperial College Research Ethics Committee Reference:20IC5890All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.