Abstract
The past nine months witnessed COVID-19’s fast-spreading at the global level. Limited by medical resources shortage and uneven facilities distribution, online help-seeking becomes an essential approach to cope with public health emergencies for many ordinaries. This study explores the driving forces behind the retransmission of online help-seeking posts. We built an analytical framework that emphasized content characteristics, including information completeness, proximity, support seeking type, disease severity, and emotion of help-seeking messages. A quantitative content analysis was conducted with a probability sample consisting of 727 posts. The results illustrate the importance of individual information completeness, high proximity, instrumental support seeking. This study also demonstrates slight inconformity with the severity principle but stresses the power of anger in help-seeking messages dissemination. As one of the first online help-seeking diffusion analyses in the COVID-19 period, our research provides a reference for constructing compelling and effective help-seeking posts during a particular period. It also reveals further possibilities for harnessing social media’s power to promote reciprocal and cooperative actions as a response to this deepening global concern.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is supported by the Science Popularization and Risk Communication of Transgenic Biotechnologies Project (2016ZX08015002) and China Scholarship Council (201906210115). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study is a non-interference study and completely irrelevant to clinical trials or experiments. Thus, there is no need to get IRB approval.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
E-mail: yuru.li{at}foxmail.com
E-mail: caftsinghuaedu{at}gmail.com
1. We significantly expanded our literature review on the relationship between pandemic response and behavioral science, as well as how emotions affect prosocial behavior. 2. We provided more information on conceptual and methodological issues. Also, we rechecked our dataset and replaced a few duplicated cases with newly added posts and reevaluated all coefficients in our paper. Statistical results in the current version are entirely accurate and reliable. 3. We refined our statistical reporting with more details, including replaced the regression coefficient plot with a more common regression table.
Data Availability
All online help-seeking posts related to COVID-19 were retrieved from the Sina Weibo platform, we listed our search terms and date range in the manuscript. All researchers can obtain the same corpus by using the search function of Sina Weibo. Besides, if you want to get a copy of our coded dataset, please refer to the figshare platform via https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12743726.v1
