RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 What triggers online help-seeking retransmission during the COVID-19 period? Empirical evidence from Chinese social media
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.13.20130054
DO 10.1101/2020.06.13.20130054
A1 Luo, Chen
A1 Li, Yuru
A1 Chen, Anfan
A1 Tang, Yulong
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.06.13.20130054.abstract
AB The past nine months witnessed COVID-19’s fast-spreading at the global level. Limited by medical resources shortage and uneven facilities distribution, online help-seeking becomes an essential approach to cope with public health emergencies for many ordinaries. This study explores the driving forces behind the retransmission of online help-seeking posts. We built an analytical framework that emphasized content characteristics, including information completeness, proximity, support seeking type, disease severity, and emotion of help-seeking messages. A quantitative content analysis was conducted with a probability sample consisting of 727 posts. The results illustrate the importance of individual information completeness, high proximity, instrumental support seeking. This study also demonstrates slight inconformity with the severity principle but stresses the power of anger in help-seeking messages dissemination. As one of the first online help-seeking diffusion analyses in the COVID-19 period, our research provides a reference for constructing compelling and effective help-seeking posts during a particular period. It also reveals further possibilities for harnessing social media’s power to promote reciprocal and cooperative actions as a response to this deepening global concern.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is supported by the Science Popularization and Risk Communication of Transgenic Biotechnologies Project (2016ZX08015002) and China Scholarship Council (201906210115). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study is a non-interference study and completely irrelevant to clinical trials or experiments. Thus, there is no need to get IRB approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll online help-seeking posts related to COVID-19 were retrieved from the Sina Weibo platform, we listed our search terms and date range in the manuscript. All researchers can obtain the same corpus by using the search function of Sina Weibo. Besides, if you want to get a copy of our coded dataset, please refer to the figshare platform via https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12743726.v1 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12743726.v1