Abstract
Background Interest exits concerning the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in patients with Covid-19 disease.
Objectives To perform a systematic review on mortality associated to the use of ACEi in patients with Covid 19 disease.
Methods Search in Medline (PubMed) and in ISI Web of Knowledge; use of other sources. Results. A total of 19 articles were evaluated. Four studies were selected and used to produce the meta-analyses. These four studies involved a total number of 1.423 patients treated with ACEi and 11.868 not treated with ACEi. Significant heterogeneity was seen concerning mortality associated to the use of ACEi in the context of Covid-19 disease. One report showed significantly decreased mortality associated to ACEi use, but this finding was not confirmed by the three other studies. No significant difference in mortality was seen in the meta-analysis (ACEi users versus non-users; random effects; odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.44 to 1.94; P = 0.84). When compared to mortality in patients treated with angiotensin receptor blockers, mortality of patients treated with ACEi was not significantly different, although a trend was noted to exist (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.41 to 1.34; P = 0.32). The population studied in the report showing decreased mortality associated to ACEi use had a mean age under 50 years, whereas two other reports had a mean or median patient age over 60 years.
Conclusions The data now presented argue in favor of carrying out clinical trials studying ACEi in Covid-19 patients, to explore the hypothesis that ACEi use has a protective effect in populations with a mean age under 50 years, but not necessarily in those with a mean age over 60 years.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding received for the preparation of the manuscript
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The author states that no patients were involved. The author states that this paper has no connection to any clinical trial. The author states that he has followed all appropriate reporting guidelines.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data was obtained from the cited articles
