Abstract
Background Existing analyses of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19 transmission have concentrated on the joint effectiveness of large-scale NPIs. With increasing data, we can move beyond estimating joint effects towards disentangling individual effects. In addition to effectiveness, policy decisions ought to account for the burden placed by different NPIs on the population.
Methods To our knowledge, this is the largest data-driven study of NPI effectiveness to date. We collected chronological data on 9 NPIs in 41 countries between January and April 2020, using extensive fact-checking to ensure high data quality. We infer NPI effectiveness with a novel semi-mechanistic Bayesian hierarchical model, modelling both confirmed cases and deaths to increase the signal from which NPI effects can be inferred. Finally, we study how much perceived burden different NPIs impose on the population with an online survey of preferences using the MaxDiff method.
Results Eight NPIs have a >95% posterior probability of being effective: closing schools (mean reduction in R: 50%; 95% credible interval: 39%–59%), closing nonessential businesses (34%; 16%–49%), closing high-risk businesses (26%; 8%–42%), and limiting gatherings to 10 people or less (28%; 8%–45%), to 100 people or less (17%; −3%–35%), to 1000 people or less (16%; −2%–31%), issuing stay-at-home orders (14%; −2%–29%), and testing patients with respiratory symptoms (13%; −1%–26%). As validation is crucial for NPI models, we performed 15 sensitivity analyses and evaluated predictions on unseen data, finding strong support for our results. We combine the effectiveness and preference results to estimate effectiveness-to-burden ratios.
Conclusions Our results suggest a surprisingly large role for schools in COVID-19 transmission, a contribution to the ongoing debate about the relevance of asymptomatic carriers in disease spread. We identify additional interventions with good effectiveness-burden tradeoffs, namely testing symptomatic individuals, closing high-risk businesses, and limiting gathering size. Closing most nonessential businesses and issuing stay-at-home orders impose a high burden while having limited additional effect.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The funding sources did not influence any aspect of study design, execution, or reporting. The costs for recruiting participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk were covered by a grant from the Berkeley Existential Risk Initiative. Jan Brauner was supported by the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Autonomous Intelligent Machines and Systems [EP/S024050/1] and by Cancer Research UK. Mrinank Sharma was supported by the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Autonomous Intelligent Machines and Systems [EP/S024050/1]. Gavin Leech was supported by the UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in Interactive Artificial Intelligence [EP/S022937/1].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The online surveys on intervention burden were approved by the Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee at the University of Oxford (Ethics Approval Reference: R69410/RE001)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This work was conducted in association with the EpidemicForecasting.org project
k Note that we did not directly measure the burden of testing because this is not possible in the framework of our preference analysis (Section 3.6)
Data Availability
All NPI data with sources and model code are available at the GitHub repository.
