ABSTRACT
Rationale Host response is a critical factor determining susceptibility to tuberculosis (TB). A delicate balance should be maintained between intracellular immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and minimizing detrimental immunopathology. Studies have identified incongruous immune responses that can lead to a similar TB disease phenotype. Instead of envisioning that susceptibility to TB follows a singular path, we propose the hypothesis that varied host endotypes exist within the TB clinical phenotype.
Methods and Results Unbiased clustering analysis from 12 publicly available gene expression datasets consisting of data from 717 TB patients and 527 controls, identified 4 TB patient endotypes with distinct immune responses. The two largest endotypes exhibit divergent metabolic, epigenetic and immune pathways. TB patient endotype A, comprising 333 TB patients (46.4%), is characterized by increased expression of genes important for i) glycolysis, ii) IL-2-STAT5, IL-6-STAT3, Type I and II Interferon IFN-γ and TNF signaling and iii) epigenetic-modifying genes. In contrast, TB patient endotype B, comprising 313 TB patients (43.6%), is characterized by i) upregulated NFAT and hormone metabolism, and ii) decreased glycolysis, IFN-γ and TNF signaling. In silico evaluation suggests therapies beneficial for endotype A could be detrimental to endotype B, and vice versa. Multiplex ELISA completed from an external validation cohort confirmed a TB patient sub-group with decreased immune upregulation.
Conclusions Host immunity to TB is heterogenous. Unbiased clustering analysis identified distinct TB endotypes with divergent metabolic, epigenetic and immune gene expression profiles that may enable stratified or personalized treatment management in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Not applicable. Not a clinical trial.
Funding Statement
NIAID K23 AI141681-02, the Cancer Prevention Institute of Texas (CPRIT) RP170005, NIH P30 shared resource grant CA125123, and NIEHS grants 1P30ES030285 and 1P42ES0327725. CL is funded by the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF). JDC is funded in part from funds provided by the Texas A&M University System and National Institutes of Health grant AI104960. MGN is supported by an ERC Advanced Grant (#833247) and a Spinoza grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are publicly available as per the manuscript.