Abstract
Artificial intelligence can be a key tool in the context of assisting in the diagnosis of dermatological conditions, particularly when performed by general practitioners with limited or no access to high resolution optical equipment. This study evaluates the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DNNs) in the classification of seven pigmented skin lesions. Additionally, it assesses the improvement ratio in the classification performance when utilized by general practitioners. Open-source skin images were downloaded from the ISIC archive. Different DNNs (n=8) were trained based on a random dataset constituted by 8,015 images. A test set of 2,003 images has been used to assess the classifiers performance at low (300 × 224 RGB) and high (600 × 450 RGB) image resolution and aggregated clinical data (age, sex and lesion localization). We have also organized two different contests to compare the DNNs performance to that of general practitioners by means of unassisted image observation. Both at low and high image resolution, the DNNs framework being trained differentiated dermatological images with appreciable performance. In all cases, accuracy has been improved when adding clinical data to the framework. Finally, the lowest accurate DNN outperformed general practitioners. Physician’s accuracy was statistically improved when allowed to use the output of this algorithmic framework as guidance. DNNS are proven to be high performers as skin lesion classifiers. The aim is to include these AI tools in the context of general practitioners whilst improving their diagnosis accuracy in a routine clinical scenario when or where the use of high-resolution equipment is not accessible.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Maximiliano Lucius and Carlos M. Galmarini are employees of Topazium. Jorge De All, José Antonio De All and Victoria Lorenzatti are employees at Sanatorio Otamendi. Luciana Radizza is an employee of IOSFA
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study used images from the anonymous and annotated HAM10000 dataset publicly available through the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) archive
