Abstract
Background N-of-1 trials have been proposed as an approach to identify the optimal individual treatment for patients with a number of recurrent medical conditions, including chronic pain and mental health. When inserted into mHealth applications, this approach holds great promise to provide an automated, efficient method to individualize patient care; however, prior to implementation, an understanding of the properties of the recurrent condition needed to draw conclusions with sufficient power is needed.
Methods We applied simulation studies and power calculations to determine statistical properties of the N-of-1 approach employed by an mHealth application for self-management of chronic recurrent medical conditions called the iMTracker.
Results In 1000 simulated patients with a single recurrent medical condition and 5 possible associated conditions, we found that ~90 days of data collection was sufficient to identify associated risk factors with odds ratio (OR > 5.0) at power ≥ 80%, with an absolute event rate of 50% being optimal. Power calculations based on Fisher’s Exact test showed that 90 days was also sufficient to detect a decrease of 20% in the rate of the primary outcome after an intervention, but that shorter data periods could be used to identify stronger effect sizes, down to 15 days with a 90% reduction in rate. Repeat analysis with Bayesian models did not significantly change power calculations, but did allow for a flexible approach that we leveraged to create a web-based tool to allow users to perform power calculations prior to using the iMTracker for self-management.
Conclusions We found that the N-of-1 approach employed in the iMTracker app for self-management of recurrent medical conditions is statistically feasible, given the right conditions. More work is needed to examine the impact of autocorrelation, seasonality, and trends in data, on statistical validity and power calculations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by grants from the NIH/NHBLI (MR: K23HL127296).
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be made available upon request and approval by co-authors
