Abstract
Background Vitamin D has been widely promoted for bone health through supplementation and fortification of the general population. However, there is growing evidence that does not support these strategies. Our aim is to review the quality and recommendations on vitamin D nutritional and clinical practice guidelines and explore predictive factors for their direction and strength.
Methods and analysis We searched PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases for vitamin D guidelines for the last 10 years. We aim to perform descriptive analysis, a quality appraisal using AGREE II scores (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) and a bivariate analysis evaluating the association recommendations and AGREE II domains’ scores and pre-specified characteristics.
Ethics and dissemination This is a systematic review protocol and therefore formal ethical approval is not required, as no primary, identifiable, personal data will be collected. Patients or the public were not involved in the design of our research. However, the findings from this review will be shared with key stakeholders, including patient groups, clinicians and guideline developers. We intend to publish our results in a suitable, peer-reviewed journal.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The project is not funded. Funding for English language editing and publication fees was obtained via an award from the foundation for Biomedical Research and innovation in Primary Care (Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica en Atención Primaria). The project has no other sources of funding.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study will be included in the published article (and its supplementary information files).
List of abbreviations
- AGREE II
- Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation / Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation version 2
- 25-OH-D
- 25-hydroxycholecalciferol
- CPGs
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- G-I-N
- Guidelines International Network
- GRADE
- Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation
- COI
- Conflicts of interest
- ICC
- Intra-class correlation coefficient
- CI
- Confidence interval
