Abstract
Vibrotactile feedback is mechanical stimulation produced using actuators in contact with the body. The stimulation parameters (frequency, amplitude, location, duration) can be adjusted to produce a variety of sensations. By characterizing how users respond to different settings, interaction designers can create more usable and enjoyable haptic interfaces. This form of haptic feedback is being used widely for alerts, gaming, and simulation; however, emerging technologies in the fields of brain health and physical therapy are introducing new users to this stimulation. For applications using vibrotactile stimulation to advance, researchers are studying perceived sensations and affective response. However, these studies often focus on healthy, younger users. It is well known that older adults and those with acquired brain injury have different physiology and different perception than young adults. Here we present a set of vibrotactile signals to adults over 40 years old with and without history of stroke and query affective impression and experienced sensations. Signals on the palm and those with a changing stimulus location were associated with higher valence ratings, while low-amplitude signals showed lowest arousal. Users preferred stimulation that they could perceive, and they could not perceive most signals applied to the forearm. Reported sensations include tickle, tingling, and numbness.
CCS Concepts Human-centered computing → User studies; Haptic devices; Ubiquitous and mobile devices.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported, in part, by the Stanford Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute Neuroscience:Translate Program. Research reported in this publication was also supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F32HD100104. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Stanford University IRB approved this study
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not Applicable
