Abstract
In the present study, we have determined SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses in a cohort of 96 individuals during the acute phase of infection and in a cohort of 578 individuals enrolled in a seroprevalence population study in Switzerland including three groups, i.e. subjects with previous RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (n=90), ‘positive patient contact’ (n=177) and ‘random selected subjects’ (n=311). Six serological assays detecting predominantly IgG antibodies targeting either the Spike (S) and/or the nucleocapsid (N) proteins were used including also a Luminex based assay using an S protein in its native trimeric form. Antibody responses against the S and/or the N proteins were equally sensitive in the acute infection phase although differences in sensitivity (range 83 to 97% 16-33 days post-initial symptoms) were observed between the different assays and the Luminex S protein trimer assay was the most sensitive. Interestingly, antibody responses against the N protein appear to wane in the post-infection phase of the infection while those against the S protein persist over time, as indicated by the drop in sensitivity of the assays targeting the N protein (sensitivity range 71-77%). Assays detecting anti-N IgG antibodies may substantially underestimate the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the groups of ‘patient positive contacts’, i.e. 10.9 to 32.2% reduction (P<0.05-<0.0001) and in the ‘random selected’ general population, i.e. up to 45% reduction (P<0.05). The overall reduction in seroprevalence for the total cohort ranged from 9.4 to 31% (P<0.0009-<0.0001). Of note, the assay using the S protein in its native trimer form was more sensitive as compared to those using monomeric S proteins.
These results indicate that assays targeting the S protein, ideally the trimeric form, should be implemented as reference test to estimate SARS-CoV-2 infections in seroprevalence population studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this project was provided through the Lausanne University Hospital, through the Swiss Vaccine research institute and through the Coronavirus Accelerated R&D in Europe (CARE) IMI project.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Commission ethique du Canton de Vaud (CER-VD) stated that authorization was not required
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data available upon request
