Abstract
Background: The translation of standard-of-care in acute ischemic stroke reperfusion interventions into practice is well established, but multifactorial obstacles exist in the complete adoption, which has led to inequities in access and delivery of services. The objective of this study was to improve access and efficiency of ischemic stroke treatment across four Atlantic Canadian Provinces. Methods: A stepped-wedge cluster trial was conducted over 30 months with 3 clusters covering 34 sites. The trial was conducted across all 4 Atlantic Canadian provinces: Nova Scotia (NS), New Brunswick (NB), Prince Edward Island (PE), and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). The design was quasi-randomized, with each cluster associated with one or more provinces: cluster 1 - NS; cluster 2 - NB and PE; and cluster 3 - NL. The patient population was all ischemic stroke patients across all 4 provinces. The intervention was a 6-month modified Quality Improvement Collaborative (mQIC), which was modified from the Breakthrough Series Collaborative to be half of the 1-year period and conducted virtually. The intervention consisted of assembling an interdisciplinary improvement team, 2 full-day workshops, webinars, and virtual site visits. Suggested changes included 6 process improvement strategies. Results: Over the trial period, 8594 ischemic stroke patients were included, out of which 1576 patients received acute treatment. The proportion of patients that received treatment did not increase significantly with the intervention [0.4% increase for patients that received thrombolysis and/or EVT (p=0.68)]. Median door-to-needle time was reduced by 9.2 minutes with the intervention (p=0.01). Cluster 3 saw the greatest improvements in both access and efficiency. Conclusions: A mQIC intervention resulted in improvement of process measures like door-to-needle time. Quality improvement initiatives may need to be longer to allow full implementation and tailored for each health system to ensure that each system sees improvement. In-person activities might be critical to ensure fidelity of the intervention.
Competing Interest Statement
NK: reports funding from CIHR, NSERC, Medtronic, Mitacs, NS Health, and NS Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. She has received speaker honorarium for Heart & Stroke Foundation of NB. She is part-owner of DESTINE Health Inc.
Clinical Trial
The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN11109800, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11109800).
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Project Grant (PJT-169124). A small grant was also received from Medtronic. The study funders had no influence in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the NS Health Research Ethics Board (REB# 1025460), Health PEI Ethics Board, Horizon Health Network Research Ethics Board (ROMEO File #: 100906 and RS#: 2020-2893), Vitalite Health Network Ethics Office (ROMEO file number: 101305), and Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board (Researcher Portal File #: 20210255 and Reference #: 2020.074).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Revisions were made to incorporate suggestions from reviewers of Stroke Journal. This includes the creation of two new figures, which present trends of key measures.
Data Availability
All data were obtain through data sharing agreements between the health system and Dalhousie University, and the data cannot be shared outside of this agreement.
