Abstract
Purpose: The 6-item Vision-related Quality of life and Limitations questionnaire (VQL-6) is a screening instrument that signals a need for additional low vision care in patients with chronic ophthalmic diseases. This study aims to (1) determine the optimal scoring method for the VQL-6 and (2) evaluate its discriminative capacity for clinical use. Methods: Patients with glaucoma and retina- and cornea-related disorders completed the VQL-6 and participated in an interview designed to distinguish between patients with and without a need of additional care. For the two subscales (general health and quality of life, HQOL, and vision-related limitations, VL) we compared a scoring model with equal item weights to a cross-validated model using regression weights. The optimal scoring method and discriminative capacity of the subscales were determined using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, with the interview outcome as gold standard. Sensitivities were evaluated at specificities of 90 and 95%. Results: In 297 interview assessments, 96 patients (32%) appeared to need additional care. Both scoring models demonstrated very similar area under the ROC curves (AUC). The selected equal weight model yielded an AUC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.87-0.94) for VL and 0.71 (0.65-0.77) for HQOL. For VL, sensitivity was 72 and 64% at 90 and 95% specificity, respectively. Corresponding HQOL sensitivities were 34 and 17%. Conclusions: The subscale VL shows excellent discriminative capacity and outperformed HQOL. Future studies should explore the feasibility of the VQL-6 in clinical practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Royal Dutch Visio, Huizen, and ZonMW, program Expertisefunctie Zintuiglijk Gehandicapten [grant number 6370051070]. The funding organizations had no role in the design, conduct, analysis, or publication of this research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics board of the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) approved the study protocol (#201800249).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research supporting data is not available.
