Abstract
Background School feeding programmes (SFP) are one of the world’s most extensive interventions to alleviate child poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition. Schools are ideal settings to promote healthy eating habits early in life since children have access to at least one main meal per day at school. However, there is a lack of clear evidence for the effectiveness of school feeding programmes on child health outcomes. Additionally, there is considerable debate on whether feeding programmes should be universal or targeted with countries taking different approaches. This review will therefore explore global research on school feeding programmes and consider different health outcomes through targeted or universal policies.
Methods We conducted a search across four electronic databases. These studies investigated the impacts of school feeding programmes on children’s health outcomes. 207 papers were identified with 76 studies subjected to full text screening.
Results A total of 42 papers were included in the final review. All papers were published within the past fifteen years (2009-2024) and included thirteen countries in total. SFP were associated with child weight being more in the healthy range. Targeted SFP were negatively associated with stigma.
Conclusions Universal SFP were effective at improving children’s health outcomes such as healthy weight, improved behaviour and social support. Overall, both targeted and universal SFP positively impact children’s health outcomes and address health disparities.
The review mapped both universal and targeted provisions, providing a broad overview of the existing literature.
The review included an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included studies. Only English studies were included.
Only studies published in English were included, potentially excluding relevant research in other languages.
The study did not perform a formal assessment of publication bias, which could impact the interpretation of the results.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research. Funding was provided by Public Health Wales and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) through their support of a PhD studentship.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This review used only openly available human data available online.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data relevant to the study are included in the manuscript.
