Abstract
Background Prior studies have shown the potential of large language models (LLMs) to support in differential diagnosis in radiology. However, the interaction of human users with LLMs in this context has not been evaluated.
Purpose To investigate the impact of human-LLM collaboration on accuracy and efficiency of brain MRI differential diagnosis.
Methods In this retrospective study, twenty brain MRI cases with a challenging but definitive diagnosis were selected and randomized into two groups. Six inexperienced radiology residents were instructed to determine the three most likely differential diagnoses for each of these cases via conventional internet search or utilizing an LLM-based search engine (© Perplexity AI, powered by GPT-4). Accuracy of suggested differential diagnoses was analyzed using the chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. Interpretation times were analyzed using the student’s t-test. Benefits and challenges in human-LLM interaction were derived from observations and participant feedback.
Results LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis yielded superior accuracy (38/59 [LLM-assisted] vs 25/59 [conventional] correct diagnoses, p = 0.03). No difference in interpretation time (8.12 +/- 3.22 min [LLM-assisted] vs 7.96 +/- 2.65 min [conventional], p = 0.76) or level of confidence (median of 2.5 [LLM-assisted] vs 3.0 [conventional], p = 0.96) was observed. Several challenges related to human errors and technical limitations were identified.
Conclusion Human-LLM collaboration has the potential to improve brain MRI differential diagnosis. Yet, several challenges must be addressed to ensure effective adoption and user acceptance.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the Technical University of Munich (School of Medicine and Health) waived ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Abbreviations
- MRI
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- LLM
- Large Language Model
