Abstract
The Therapy Intensity Level (TIL) scale and its abridged version (TIL(Basic)) are used to record the intensity of daily management for raised intracranial pressure (ICP) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, it is uncertain: (1) whether TIL is valid across the wide variation in modern ICP treatment strategies, (2) if TIL performs better than its predecessors, (3) how TIL’s component therapies contribute to the overall score, and (4) whether TIL(Basic) may capture sufficient information. We aimed to answer these questions by assessing TIL on a contemporary population of ICP-monitored TBI patients (n=873) in 52 intensive care units (ICUs) across 18 European countries and Israel. From the observational, prospective Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, we extracted first-week daily TIL scores (TIL24), ICP values, physician-based impressions of aberrant ICP, clinical markers of injury severity, and six-month functional outcome scores. We evaluated the construct and criterion validity of TIL against that of its predecessors, an unweighted version of TIL, and TIL(Basic). We calculated the median score of each TIL component therapy for each total score as well as associations between each component score and markers of injury severity. Moreover, we calculated the information coverage of TIL by TIL(Basic), defined by the mutual information of TIL and TIL(Basic) divided by the entropy of TIL. The statistical validity measures of TIL were significantly greater or similar to those of alternative scales, and TIL integrated the widest range of modern ICP treatments. First-week median TIL24 (TILmedian) outperformed first-week maximum TIL24 (TILmax) in discriminating refractory intracranial hypertension (RIC) during ICU stay, and the thresholds which maximised the sum of sensitivity and specificity for RIC detection were TILmedian≥7.5 (sensitivity: 81% [95% CI: 77–87%], specificity: 72% [95% CI: 70–75%]) and TILmax≥14 (sensitivity: 68% [95% CI: 62–74%], specificity: 79% [95% CI: 77–81%]). The sensitivity-specificity-optimising TIL24 threshold for detecting surgical ICP control was TIL24≥9 (sensitivity: 87% [95% CI: 83–91%], specificity: 74% [95% CI: 72–76%]). The median component scores for each TIL24 reflected a credible staircase approach to treatment intensity escalation, from head positioning to surgical ICP control, as well as considerable variability in the use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and decompressive craniectomy. First-week maximum TIL(Basic) (TIL(Basic)max) suffered from a strong ceiling effect and could not replace TILmax. TIL(Basic)24 and first-week median TIL(Basic) (TIL(Basic)median) could be a suitable replacement for TIL24 and TILmedian, respectively (up to 33% [95% CI: 31–35%] information coverage). Numerical ranges were derived for categorising TIL24 scores into TIL(Basic)24 scores. Our results validate the TIL scale across a spectrum of ICP management and monitoring approaches and support its use as an intermediate outcome after TBI.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Brain Injury MedTech Co-operative. CENTER-TBI was supported by the European Union 7th Framework programme (EC grant 602150). Additional funding was obtained from the Hannelore Kohl Stiftung (Germany), from OneMind (USA), from Integra LifeSciences Corporation (USA), and from NeuroTrauma Sciences (USA). CENTER-TBI also acknowledges interactions and support from the International Initiative for TBI Research (InTBIR) investigators. S.B. is funded by a Gates Cambridge Scholarship. E.B. is funded by the Medical Research Council (MR N013433-1) and by a Gates Cambridge Scholarship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The list of sites, ethical committees, approval numbers, and approval dates can be found online: https://www.center-tbi.eu/project/ethical-approval. Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Universitat Wien of Medizinische Universitat Wien Universitatsklinik fur Unfallchirurgie gave ethical approval for this work Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Universitat Innsbruck of Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck Universitatsklinik fur Neurologie gave ethical approval for this work Centraal Ethisch Comite, Ethisch Comite Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen en de Universiteit Antwerpen of Antwerp University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Centraal Ethisch Comite, Ethisch Comite Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen en de Universiteit Antwerpen Comite d'Ethique 412 of CHR Citadelle gave ethical approval for this work Centraal Ethisch Comite, Ethisch Comite Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen en de Universiteit Antwerpen Comite d'Ethique hospitalo-facultaire niversitaire de Liege (707) of CHU gave ethical approval for this work Centraal Ethisch Comite, Ethisch Comite Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen en de Universiteit Antwerpen Comissie Medische Ethiek UZ KU Leuven / Onderzoek of UZ Leuven gave ethical approval for this work De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for Region Syddanmark of Odense Universiteitshospital, Neurokirurgisk afdeling gave ethical approval for this work De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for Region Syddanmark of Region Hovedstaden Rigshopitalet gave ethical approval for this work Varsinais suomen sairaanhoitopiirin kuntayhtyma, Eettinen Toimikunta of Turku University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Varsinais suomen sairaanhoitopiirin kuntayhtyma, Eettinen Toimikunta of Helsinki University Central Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Sante ANSM of APHP gave ethical approval for this work Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Sante ANSM of CHRU de Besancon gave ethical approval for this work Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Sante ANSM of Lille University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Sante ANSM of University Hospital of Grenoble gave ethical approval for this work Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Sante ANSM of University Hospital Nancy gave ethical approval for this work Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Sante ANSM of CHU Poitiers gave ethical approval for this work Ethikkommission Medizinsche Fakultat Heidelberg of Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg Neurochirurgische Kliniki gave ethical approval for this work Ethikkommission an der Medizinsche Fakultat Der rheinsch-Westfalischen Technischen Hocgschule Aachen of Charite | Campus Virchow Klinikum gave ethical approval for this work Ethikkommission an der Medizinsche Fakultat Der rheinsch-Westfalischen Technischen Hocgschule Aachen of Uniklinik RWTH Aachen gave ethical approval for this work Ethikkommission Medizinsche Fakultat Heidelberg of Klinikum Ludwigsburg gave ethical approval for this work ETT TUKEB Egeszsegugyi Tudomanyos Tanacs Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem of Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem Klinikai Kozpont gave ethical approval for this work ETT TUKEB Egeszsegugyi Tudomanyos Tanacs Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem of zegedi tudomanyegyetem orvostudomanyi kar Szent Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont gave ethical approval for this work Helsinki Committee, Rambam Health Care Campus of Rambam Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work Hadassah Medical Organization IRB of Hadassah-hebrew University Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Direzione Scientifica Comitato Etico of Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico gave ethical approval for this work Comitato Etico, Ospedale San Raffaele of Ospedale San Raffaele gave ethical approval for this work Comitato Etico Interaziendale A.O.U. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, A.S.L. of AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino gave ethical approval for this work Comitato Etico IRST IRCCS AVR of Bufalini Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Comitato Etico, Ospedale San Raffaele of Azienda Ospedaliera Universita di Padova gave ethical approval for this work Comitato Etico Della Provincia Monza Brianza of San Gerardo Hospital/ASST gave ethical approval for this work Comitato Etico Interaziendale A.O.U. 'Maggiore della Carita' of Maggiore Della Carita Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Comitato Etico, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda of Niguarda Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Ethics Commiitee for Clinical Research at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Development Society of Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Ethics Commiitee for Clinical Research at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Development Society of Riga Eastern Clinical University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Ethics Commiitee for Clinical Research at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Development Society of Rezekne Hospital gave ethical approval for this work VILNIAUS REGIONINIS BIOMEDICININIU TYRIMU ETIKOS KOMITETAS of Vilniaus Universiteto Ligonine gave ethical approval for this work KAUNO REGIONINIS BIOMEDICININIU TYRIMU ETIKOS KOMITETAS of LSMUL Kauno klinikos Skubio pagalbos skyrius gave ethical approval for this work Leids Universitair Centrum, Commissie Medische Ethiek of Het Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum te Leiden gave ethical approval for this work Leids Universitair Centrum, Commissie Medische Ethiek of Erasmus MC gave ethical approval for this work Leids Universitair Centrum, Commissie Medische Ethiek of Medisch Centrum Haaglanden gave ethical approval for this work Leids Universitair Centrum, Commissie Medische Ethiek of Het Haga Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Leids Universitair Centrum, Commissie Medische Ethiek of Radboud UMC gave ethical approval for this work Leids Universitair Centrum, Commissie Medische Ethiek of St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis gave ethical approval for this work Leids Universitair Centrum, Commissie Medische Ethiek of UMC Groningen gave ethical approval for this work Regional komite for medisinsk og helsefaglig forskningsetikk REK midt-Norge (REK midt) of Universitetssykehuset Nord-Norge gave ethical approval for this work Regional komite for medisinsk og helsefaglig forskningsetikk REK midt-Norge (REK midt) of St.Olavs Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Regional komite for medisinsk og helsefaglig forskningsetikk REK midt-Norge (REK midt) of Oslo Universitetssykehus gave ethical approval for this work Comitetului de Etica a Spitalului Clinic Judeteam de Urgenta Timisoara of Clinica de Neurochirurgie Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Victor Babes Timisoara gave ethical approval for this work Etidkog odbora Klinidkog centra Vojvodine of Klinidkog centra Vojvodine gave ethical approval for this work Comite Etico de Investigacion Clinica del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre gave ethical approval for this work Comite etico de investigacion clinica y comision de proyectos de investigacion del hospital universitari Vall d'Hebron of Vall d'Hebron University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work Comite Etico de Investigacion Clinica de Euskadi of Clinico Universitario de Cruces gave ethical approval for this work Comite Etico de Investigacion Clinica del Clinico Universitario de Valencia of Clinico Universitario de Valencia gave ethical approval for this work EPN (Regionala Etikprovningsnamnden i Stockholm) of Karolinksa University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work EPN (Regionala Etikprovningsnamnden i Stockholm) of Umea University Hosptital gave ethical approval for this work La Commission cantonale (VD) d'ethique de la recherche sur l'etre humain (CER-VD) of Centre hospitalier universitaire Vaudois gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, UHB Research Governance Office, Queen Elizabeth Hospital of Queen Elizabeth Hospital gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, Research and Development Department, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust of Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, Research Governance Office, University Hospitals Southhampton NHS Trust of University Hospitals Southhampton NHS Trust gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, Research and Development Department -Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust of Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, Research & Innovation Office, Kings college London NHS Foundation Trust of Kings college London gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, Research and Development Department -Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust of Salford Royal Hospital gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, Research & Innovation Office, The Walton centre NHS Foundation Trust of The Walton centre NHS Foundation Trust gave ethical approval for this work NHS HRA, Research & Innovation, North Bristol NHS Trust of Southmead Hospital Bristol gave ethical approval for this work NHS Scotland, Research and Development Department, University Hospitals Division NHS Lothian of Lothian Health Board gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Individual participant data are available online, conditional to approved online study proposal, with no end date at https://www.center-tbi.eu/data. Signed confirmation of a data access agreement is required, and all access must comply with regulatory restrictions imposed on the original study. All analytic code used to perform the statistical analyses are publicly available online at: https://github.com/sbhattacharyay/CENTER-TBI_TIL.
