Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this literature review was to clarify the sufficiency and efficiency needs, as well as the stratification and the assignment scoring principles of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set, in conjunction with the Item Response Theory (IRT)-derived functioning outcome measures.
Methods A literature search has been done on the PubMed database. We included studies involving the IRT-derived ICF evaluation tool. Our main outcome was the assignment and stratification scoring principle of IRT-derived ICF-based functioning outcome measures.
Results 46 relative articles met the eligibility criteria of our review. On this basis, this review was undertaken to track the research progress of the ICF-based and IRT-modeling measurement tools and screen the final core set. This review included a classification of IRT modeling for ICF studies and a summary of existing research paradigms of IRT-derived ICF outcome measures. Moreover, this review identified blind spots related to scoring assignment principles and “difficulty parameter” in current ICF-based IRT studies.
Conclusion The ICF is the worldwide terminology system for functioning categories, while ICF-based evaluation in clinical practice and scientific research has elicited the underlying challenges. However, the algorithm of the ICF-based IRT modeling may advance the understanding of ICF clinical application and enable a new paradigm for the design of IRT-derived ICF questionnaires, namely the parsimonious core set of ICF. Additionally, the Wright map has the potential to facilitate an understanding of the rehabilitation process and tailor rehabilitation goals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research is sponsored by Shanghai Sailing Program (23YF1433700).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Chun FENG Email: emily16602{at}outlook.com
Shou-Guo LIU Email: liushouguo2002{at}163.com
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
