RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Research Paradigm of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) with Item Response Theory: Clarification, Classification, and Challenge
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.14.23289950
DO 10.1101/2023.05.14.23289950
A1 Feng, Chun
A1 Liu, Shou-Guo
A1 Lin, Feng
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/15/2023.05.14.23289950.abstract
AB Objectives The purpose of this literature review was to clarify the sufficiency and efficiency needs, as well as the stratification and the assignment scoring principles of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set, in conjunction with the Item Response Theory (IRT)-derived functioning outcome measures.Methods A literature search has been done on the PubMed database. We included studies involving the IRT-derived ICF evaluation tool. Our main outcome was the assignment and stratification scoring principle of IRT-derived ICF-based functioning outcome measures.Results 46 relative articles met the eligibility criteria of our review. On this basis, this review was undertaken to track the research progress of the ICF-based and IRT-modeling measurement tools and screen the final core set. This review included a classification of IRT modeling for ICF studies and a summary of existing research paradigms of IRT-derived ICF outcome measures. Moreover, this review identified blind spots related to scoring assignment principles and “difficulty parameter” in current ICF-based IRT studies.Conclusion The ICF is the worldwide terminology system for functioning categories, while ICF-based evaluation in clinical practice and scientific research has elicited the underlying challenges. However, the algorithm of the ICF-based IRT modeling may advance the understanding of ICF clinical application and enable a new paradigm for the design of IRT-derived ICF questionnaires, namely the parsimonious core set of ICF. Additionally, the Wright map has the potential to facilitate an understanding of the rehabilitation process and tailor rehabilitation goals.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research is sponsored by Shanghai Sailing Program (23YF1433700).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.