Summary
Importance There is uncertainty regarding the long-term risk of dementia in individuals with a history of participation in sports characterised by repetitive head impact, and whether the occurrence of this disease differs between former amateur and professional athletes.
Objective To quantify the dementia risk in former athletes with a background in contact sports using new cohort study data incorporated into a meta-analysis.
Data sources and study selection The cohort study comprised 2005 male retired athletes who had competed internationally for Finland (1920-1965) and a general population comparison group (N=1386). For the systematic review, we searched PubMed and Embase from their inception to August 23 2022, including cohort studies published in English that reported standard estimates of association and variance.
Data extraction and synthesis Studies were screened and results extracted independently by two authors. Study-specific estimates were aggregated using random-effect meta-analysis. An adapted Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess study quality.
Main outcomes and measures The primary outcomes were dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.
Results The systematic review identified 827 potentially eligible published articles, of which 7 met the inclusion criteria. Incorporating the new results from the Finnish cohort study with those from the systematic review revealed that former boxers had higher rates of dementia (2 studies: summary risk ratio 3.14 [95% CI 1.72, 5.74], I2=34%) and Alzheimer’s disease (2 studies: 3.07 [1.01, 9.38], I2=55%), as did retired soccer players (3 studies of dementia: 2.78 [1.69, 4.59], I2=86%; 2 studies of Alzheimer’s disease: 3.22 [1.34, 7.75], I2=81%). While the pooled estimate for dementia in retired American football players was less convincing (4 studies: 1.63 [0.76, 3.49], I2 =75%), disease occurrence in onetime professionals was markedly higher (2.96 [1.66, 5.30]) than amateurs in whom there was no association (0.90 [0.52, 1.56]). There was also a risk differential for retired professional (3.61 [2.92, 4.45]) and amateur (1.60 [1.11, 2.30]) soccer players.
Conclusion and relevance Based on studies exclusively comprising men, former participants in contact sports subsequently experienced poorer brain health, and there was a suggestion that retired professionals had the greatest risk.
Question Do former participants in contact sports have a greater risk of dementia than the general population?
Findings Compared with general population controls, retired male participants from the contact sports of boxing, soccer, and American football appeared to have an elevated risk of dementia at follow-up. For soccer and American football, the risk in former professionals was higher than erstwhile amateurs.
Meaning Retired male contact sports participants seem to subsequently experience poorer brain health.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
GDB is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/P023444/1) and the US National Institute on Aging (1R56AG052519-01; 1R01AG052519-01A1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data collection was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital Districts of Helsinki and Uusimaa, and all participants provided informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(E. david.batty{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(philipp.frank.16{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(urho.m.kujala{at}fimnet.fi)
(seppo.sarna{at}helsinki.fi)
(c.valencia-hernandez{at}imperial.ac.uk)
(jaakko.kaprio{at}helsinki.fi)
Conflict of interest: None to declare.
Data sharing: Interested parties should contact UMK and SJS regarding access to the Finnish cohort study data.
The only change is to the funders.
Data Availability
Bona fide researchers should contact the authors to discuss the availability of raw data.
