Abstract
Objectives In mid-adolescence, to 1) examine cyclical associations between social media use and mental ill health by investigating longitudinal and bidirectional associations, dose response relationships, and changes in social media use and in mental health; 2) assess potential interaction effects between social media use and mental health with pre-existing early life vulnerabilities.
Methods Longitudinal data on 12,114 participants from the Millennium Cohort Study on social media use, depressive symptoms, self-harm and early life risk factors were used.
Results We found little support for the existence of cyclical relationships between social media use and mental health. Where detected, effect sizes were small. Dose response associations were seen in the direction of mental health to social media (depressive symptoms 1 time OR=1.22, 2 times OR=1.71; self-harm 1 time OR=1.17, 2 times OR=1.53), but not for social media to mental health. Changes in social media use and changes in mental health were not associated with each other. We found no evidence to suggest that either social media use or mental health interacted with pre-existing risk for mental ill health.
Conclusions Findings highlight the possibility that observed longitudinal associations between social media use and mental health might reflect other risk processes or vulnerabilities and/or the precision of measures used. More detailed and frequently collected prospective data about online experiences, including those from social media platforms themselves will help to provide a clearer picture of the relationship between social media use and mental health.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
During the conduct of the study YK and AS received funding from Economic and Social Research Council (ES/R008930/1). YK, PP and BZ received funding from Medical Research Council (MR/W002450/1). CB received funding from Economic and Social Research Council (RES-586-47-0001/RES-586-47-0002). RL received funding from Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC ES/P010229/1)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Source data were openly available before the start of the study and are available from https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000031
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000031
