1 ABSTRACT
The non-linear spatiotemporal features in the continuing EEG recordings could be helpful to infer the physio and pathological significance of early insults on the brain, such as early malnutrition and their long-term effects. A unique opportunity is opened with the Barbados Nutrition Study (BNS) dedicated to studying Protein-Energy Malnutrition (PEM) with two groups, children suffering an early PEM episode and their controls. We evaluated the resting-state EEG (N=108, PEM=46) in 1978, and we repeated the EEG (N=97, PEM=46) in 2018. We did a qualitative analysis of the EEG using a semi-quantitative scale (Grand Total EEG (GTE)) and an item response theory (IRT) approach to estimate a latent variable that is able to explain the subjacent neurophysiological status (NPS). Finally, we applied a mixed-effects model with a sensitivity index for ignorability to test differences between the controls and PEM groups while accounting for the missing data mechanisms (nlme (Pinheiro J. 2020) and the ISNI package in R(Xie et al., 2018). The fixed effects were group, age, gender, and socioeconomic status; the random effect was the variability inherent to each participant and evaluator.
Results The simple visual inspection of the 1978 EEG recordings detected 39 participants with abnormalities (28 PEM and 11 Controls; p<0.05); in 2018, a total of 63 participants showed abnormalities in the EEG recordings (35 PEM and 28 Controls; p<0.01)).
The polytomous IRT analysis revealed that all items had been loaded well onto the latent factor, and the highest value of the Focal abnormality reached 0.97. The fixed effect of the groups (PEM vs. Control) was highly significant, with a p-value of 0 and the c index of 5.27. Age was also significant with a p-value of 0.0093 and the c index of 14.793, whereas Gender and SES were not significant. The contrasts at the two different time points (childhood (1978) mean age= 8.45, adulthood (2018) mean age=48.30) also showed highly significant differences between groups with a p-value of 0.
Conclusions EEG abnormalities were seen in both PEM and control groups during the school years and later in middle adulthood, with a higher proportion of abnormalities in the previously malnourished BNS participants at both ages. The statistical significance of these differences was confirmed through a latent variable approach and a linear mixed-effect model, which discriminated successfully against the long-term effects of early malnutrition on the brain up to 50 years after the onset of malnutrition in the first year of life.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was conducted in cooperation with the Ministry of Health of Barbados and was supported by grants from Nestle Foundation (to MLB and PAVS, Validation of a long-life neural fingerprint of early malnutrition, 2017), National Institutes of Health (HD060986 to JRG), the NSFC Project No. 61871105) and CNS Program of UESTC (No. Y0301902610100201).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Barbados Ministry of Health granted general approval for this study, the Massachusetts General Hospital IRB (2015P000329/PHS/MGB), and the Cuban Neuroscience Center (2017/02/17/CNEURO). All the participants were volunteers and signed informed consent before the study. They were compensated for their time and travel to and from the Barbados Nutrition Study (BNS) Center.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* share first co-authorship
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
