Abstract
Problem definition To respond to pandemics such as COVID-19, policy makers have relied on interventions that target specific population groups or activities. Since targeting is potentially contentious, rigorously quantifying its benefits is critical for designing effective and equitable pandemic control policies.
Methodology/results We propose a flexible modeling framework and a set of associated algorithms that compute optimally targeted, time-dependent interventions that coordinate across two dimensions of heterogeneity: age of different groups and the specific activities that individuals engage in during the normal course of a day. We showcase a complete implementation focused on the Île-de-France region of France, based on commonly available public data. We find that targeted policies generate substantial complementarities that lead to Pareto improvements, reducing the number of deaths and the economic losses, as well as the time in confinement for each age group. Optimized dual-targeted policies are interpretable: by fitting decision trees to our raw policy’s decisions across many problem instances, we find that a feature corresponding to the ratio of marginal economic value prorated by social contacts is highly salient in explaining the confinements that any group - activity pair experiences. We also quantify the impact of fairness requirements that explicitly limit the differential treatment of distinct groups, and find that satisfactory trade-offs are achievable through limited targeting.
Implications Given that some amount of targeting of activities and age groups is already in place in real-world pandemic responses, our framework highlights the significant benefits in explicitly and transparently modelling targeting and identifying the interventions that rigorously optimize overall societal welfare.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed. No necessary IRB/ethics committee approvals, to the best of our knowledge.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
camelo{at}stanford.edu,
florin.ciocan{at}insead.edu,
daniancu{at}stanford.edu,
xwarnes{at}stanford.edu,
spyros.zoumpoulis{at}insead.edu,
↵7 This is due to the fact that a small fraction of the members of the 10-19 year old group are already in workforce. We do not count the value of lost schooling for them.
↵8 Note that we are counting the entire value for the 60-69 y.o. age group; this is due to the fact that, as we explain in Section EC.4, this value has already incorporated that only a fraction of the population in the 60-69 y.o. age group have work-eligible ages (60-64 y.o.), while the rest are retired.
↵9 In the expressions in (EC.27), (EC.29), (EC.33), we follow the convention that a product of matrices over an empty set of indices results in the identity matrix.
↵10 We retrieve the parameter values as reported before Salje et al. (2020) updated them on July 8, 2020.
↵11 We note that Du et al. (2020) estimate the serial interval, and not the infectious period, to be 3.96 days. We borrow their confidence interval for the serial interval estimation and use it as an uncertainty range for our infectious period, which is of about the same length as their estimated serial interval.
↵12 This is a normalization to account for employees doing part time work.
↵13 For reference, we provide here the French rule. For a geographic “department” in France to be declared under maximum alert, three criteria need to be satisfied. First criterion: the incidence rate, i.e. the number of positive cases per 100,000 inhabitants over seven days, must be greater than 250 per 100,000 inhabitants. Second criterion: the incidence rate among those over 65, the most vulnerable population, must exceed 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Third criterion: more than 30% of resuscitation beds must be occupied by patients with COVID-19.
↵14 For the incidence rate, we count new cases using the Infectious state (and not the Exposed state) of the SEIR model; this is aligned with the assumption that a positive case can be detected through a viral test if and only if the individual is in the Infectious state.
↵15 Our targeted features include age group and activity themselves. To handle the categorical nature of activities, we create dummy indicator variables for each a.
↵16 For simplicity, we fold the lost wages term
from our original model into χ.↵17 To see this, fix all the problem parameters and define
Then g(T) = 0, while
because ex(a+b) − ex(−a+b) ≤ 0 for a ≥ 0, x ≤ 0. Therefore g is non-increasing in t in [0, T], and g(t) ≥ 0 for 0 ≤ t ≤ T.↵18 Since we use the simplification S(t) + E (t) + I(t) + R(t) ≈ N, it stands to reason that a per capita value is sufficient here.
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript are public and URL references to the datasets are included in the manuscript.
