Abstract
Background Globally, 5 billion people lack timely access to safe and affordable surgical care, with over a fifth of them living in India. Solving India’s surgical access issues can have high returns on investment. While healthcare access and unaffordability problems are well-known in India particularly among its rural people, research on surgical volumes and need is scant. This study attempts to fill the research gap through high-resolution nationwide estimates that have direct implications for India’s national surgical plan.
Methods Secondary data analysis with a diverse geospatial and statistical toolbox was used to create the national, state, and district-level estimates for surgical rates and c- section proportions and their corresponding met need w.r.t. to the globally prescribed thresholds – 5000 major surgeries (those requiring anesthesia) per 100,000 (Lancet Commission on Global Surgery) and 10-15% of all institutional deliveries (World Health Organization).
Results Nationally, only 6.81% of need for major surgical operations was met for rural India. 13.6% of the institutional deliveries were c-sections falling within the WHO- prescribed range of 10-15%. There were marked variations at state and district-levels and significant rural-urban differences for surgical rates and c-section proportions. We validate our estimates based on data from Health Management and Information System against existing sources that are commonly used in academic and policy research.
Conclusions Our methodological workflow has high translational value for global surgery research in low-and-middle-income countries. For India, these are the first such nationwide findings that can direct the development of a National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study did not have any primary research funder or sponsor. From 2019-2021, SZ was supported by Duke Global Health Institute Merit Scholarship and Assistantship; JV is supported by multiple grants at DGHI and Duke University School of Medicine.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
