ABSTRACT
Importance Homeless or precariously housed individuals live with poor health and experience premature mortality compared to the general population. With an increasing average age among this demographic, syndromes associated with neurogenerative disease are also increasing. Quantitative MRI measures may help define the roles of age and risk factors for poor brain health among these individuals.
Objective To evaluate whether MRI measures of brain structure are differentially associated with age and selected risk factors among individuals who are homeless or precariously housed compared to a general population sample.
Design, setting, and participants Cross sectional comparison of baseline data from 312 community-based, precariously housed participants with a publicly available dataset of 382 participants recruited from the general population.
Exposure(s) The primary exposure was housing status (precariously housed vs general population). Risk factors in the precariously housed sample included mental illness, substance dependence, intravenous drug use, HIV, and history of traumatic brain injury.
Main outcome(s) and measure(s) The main outcomes were MRI measures of whole-brain tissue- to-intracranial volume ratio, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. Multiple linear regression and piecewise regression were used to evaluate differences in associations between MRI measures and age between the samples, and to explore associations with risk factors in the precariously housed sample.
Results Compared to the general population sample, older age in the precariously housed sample was associated with more whole-brain atrophy (β=-0.20, p=0.0029), lower whole-brain FA (β=-0.32, p<0.0001), and higher whole-brain MD (β=0.69, p<0.0001). Several MRI measures had non-linear associations with age, with further adverse changes after age 35-40 in the precariously housed sample. Frontal and temporal cortical thickness, corpus callosum volume, and diffusivity in the association tracts, corpus callosum, and thalamic radiations were the regions of interest most differentially affected. History of traumatic brain injury, stimulant dependence, and heroin dependence were associated with more atrophy or alterations in white matter diffusivity in the precariously housed sample.
Conclusions and relevance Older age is associated with adverse MRI measures of brain structure among homeless and precariously housed individuals compared to the general population. Education, improvements in care provision and policy may help to reduce the health disparities experienced by these individuals.
Competing Interest Statement
TSF is supported by a Sauder Family/Heart and Stroke Professorship of Stroke Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. WGH has received consulting fees from Translational Life Sciences, Guidepoint, and AbbVie for work unrelated to the Hotel Study. All other authors have no disclosures.
Funding Statement
Funding support for the Hotel Study includes the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-137103, MOP-390996, PJT-169094) and the BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute. Data collection and sharing for this project for the CamCAN sample was provided by the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience. CamCAN funding was provided by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant number BB/H008217/1), together with support from the UK Medical Research Council and the University of Cambridge, UK.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board of the University of British Columbia gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from the Cambridge Centre for Aging and Neuroscience is available at: https://www.cam-can.org. Data from the Hotel Study cannot be made publicly available due to possible privacy breaches and other ethical and legal obligations to the study participants. These restrictions are outlined by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board and the Simon Fraser University Research Ethics Board. Inquiries regarding data can be made to the Clinical Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia and the study principal investigator (WGH).
