Abstract
IMPORTANCE Colorectal Cancer (CRC) disparities continue to impact vulnerable populations. Across the CRC care continuum, most focus has been attributed to interventions in prevention, detection, and diagnosis. Varying surgical outcomes has emerged as an important contributing factor to CRC disparities.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the distribution of publications across the CRC care continuum, examine interventional studies related to CRC Surgery, and synthesize findings in studies evaluating CRC disparities in Surgery.
DATA SOURCES We searched PubMed for prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on colorectal cancer disparities.
STUDY SELECTION Studies were selected if: (1) articles used US-sourced data (2) articles were published in the English language, and (3) Subjects included humans only or data.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Odds ratios for receipt of surgery for black versus white patients were pooled from studies that performed multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed per procedure type.
RESULTS No publications regarding interventions associated with improvements in colorectal cancer surgery were found. Of the 1600 CRC disparities articles identified, an analysis was conducted from 18 publications. It included 89,214 black patients and 646,990 white patients. Black patients were significantly less likely to receive surgical treatment for CRC than white patients. This was confirmed in the sensitivity analysis by cancer site (colon vs rectum).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Based on the results, the majority of studies on CRC disparities have focused on access to prevention, diagnosis and screening. Considering the impact of varying surgical outcomes on vulnerable populations, it should be considered to shift research focus from process-oriented interventions to outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Exempt from IRB review
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Online publications Citations 11-29
