Peer review report
Reviewer: Dr. Kilani Hajer
Institution: Tunisian Institute of Veterinary Research
email: hajerkilani@yahoo.fr
General assessment
The article is scientifically correct, the English language is acceptable; discussion is rich and linked to their results. The article can be accepted after minor revision.
Essential revisions that are required to verify the manuscript
1- Abstract, you said that you found ‘Twelve E. coli’, then you wrote ‘Phylogroup B1 of environment origin was the most predominant (58%, n=12) among the isolates, followed by commensal phylogroup A (16%), phylogroup C (8%), D (8%), and E (8%)’. The number of these phylogroups do not correspond to the total isolates that you collected (n=12)?? Please verify. I realized that you mean by percentage among 12 isolates, therefore it is better for example to write ‘most predominant (n=7; 58%), also for the other phylogroups
2- If the number of studied isolates is 12, please never use percentages, since it is not appropriate for number under at least 30.
3- In the abstract as well in the manuscript, the occurrence of integrons do not means that these integrons contains gene cassettes that encode antimicrobial resistance. Many studies reported the occurrence of class 1 integrons with empty variable regions. Therefore, please take this in mind and modify your discussion.
4- Introduction, you wrote ‘..are typically comprised of phylogenetic groups A, B, and D’. I believe you mean B1 phylogroup, correct this.
5- You wrote ‘..prepared, as Mandal et al. (2014) said’. PLEASE delete the word ‘said’
6- Write ‘Purified 16S rRNA amplicons (Figure 2) were digested with three different restriction enzymes’ correct this also in Figure 2.
7- You wrote ‘In this research, E. coli was isolated at a rate of 8%’. Please, you investigate 60 samples and you find 12 isolates, so 12/60 X100 = 20%. So how you speak about 8%?
8- As I mentioned above since you find only 12 isolates, please avoid to provide percentage, please provide the number of isolates when appropriate and especially in the section ‘Distribution of phylogroups of E. coli in street foods’
9- You provide figure 4, but it is not indicated in your manuscript. If it is not necessary, you can delete it.
10- You wrote ‘..Genes carried by integrons usually express multiple resistance mechanisms, such as resistance to beta-lactams…’ in reality beta-lactamase genes are not part of integrons, they are not gene cassette, they can be near integrons but not as gene casette.
Other suggestions to improve the manuscript
Try to avoid unnecessary figures, and shorten the discussion if possible
Decision
Verified with reservations: The content is scientifically sound but has shortcomings that could be improved by further studies and/or minor revisions.
