Abstract
Background Large out-of-home (OOH) food businesses in England have been required by law to display calorie information on menus since 6th April 2022. This study investigates whether the implementation of this policy was associated with changes in calories purchased OOH.
Methods Controlled interrupted time series analysis was used to estimate changes in calories purchased from all OOH outlets in England (intervention group). Secondary outcomes included purchases from large chain outlets, non-chain outlets and five sub-types of purchases (meals, lower-calorie coffee, higher-calorie coffee, sandwiches, and fish and chip meals). The control series consisted of purchases from non-chain outlets in Scotland and Wales. Itemised OOH food and non-alcoholic drink purchase records, matched to calorie (kcal) content at one point in time, covered 13 weeks pre- and 34 weeks post-intervention (3rd January to 27th November 2022) and were aggregated to population level average weekly kcal purchase estimates. Linear regression, adjusted for season and inflation, was used to model level and trend changes compared to the counterfactual of no mandatory policy. The counterfactual was constructed from the intervention series’ pre-intervention level and the control series’ post-intervention level and trend. Subgroup analyses explored effects by age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), weight status, and weekday/weekend purchases.
Results Compared to the counterfactual, we found no evidence of a change in overall calories purchased OOH associated with mandatory calorie labelling. There was also no robust evidence of changes in calories purchased OOH for secondary outcomes and by subgroups compared to the counterfactual of no mandatory calorie labelling. Small changes observed in these analyses were sensitive to analytical choices.
Discussion Our findings suggest that mandatory calorie labelling in England did not reduce overall calories purchased from OOH venues. Findings should be interpreted taking into account that the data used did not capture possible changes to menus. Our findings support existing evidence that information provision alone is unlikely to secure significant changes in food purchasing behaviour at population level.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (SPHR) (Grant Reference Number NIHR 204000). JA was supported by the Medical Research Council (Grant Reference Number MC UU 00006/7). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Kantar OOH Service Data were partially acquired via project grant (NIHR133887) from the NIHR.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was not required as the data were obtained in anonymised format (see https://www.kantarworldpanel.com/).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.