Abstract
Abstract Introduction Growing evidence suggests that biological sex influences the incidence, presentation, diagnosis and outcomes of many lung diseases. Understanding these differences is the first step towards precision medicine to improve patient care. Methods IPF patients enrolled in a national, multicentre registry (UK BTS ILD) were categorised by sex and analysed for differences in demographics, pulmonary function tests, HRCT radiological pattern, eligibility/uptake of antifibrotics and survival. Results Of 7177 cases, 77.8% (n=5587) were male, median age 75 years (IQR 69.5,80.5) for both sexes (p=0.83). Males were more likely to have a history of smoking (p<0.001) and lower baseline median FVC % predicted (males 76.4%, IQR 66.2,86.7 vs females 78.8%, IQR 68.6,89.1, p<0.001). Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were statistically more common in males (p<0.001), whilst major depressive illness was more common in females (p<0.001). Significantly more females experienced symptoms for >24 months prior to first clinic appointment (females 40.1% vs males 36.6%, p=0.028). Whilst more males in the cohort met eligibility criteria for antifibrotics at baseline (p<0.001), a larger proportion chose not to commence antifibrotic treatment (males 47.0% vs females 29.6%, p<0.001). Female sex was associated with longer mean survival (female 9.99 years (95% CI 9.18-10.79) vs males 8.57 years (95% CI 8.15,8.99), p<0.001). Male sex, higher age, lower baseline FVC % predicted and co-existent lung cancer were all independently associated with worse survival (p<0.001). Conclusion This is the first UK study to use national registry data to systematically evaluate IPF disease characteristics stratifying by biological sex and highlights distinct characteristics between groups. Future clinical trials should explicitly explore sex-specific targeted interventions and analyses, to optimise future IPF patient care.
Competing Interest Statement
SB has received speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work. SM has received speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. GD is a member of the BTS ILD registry steering committee, outside the submitted work.
Funding Statement
SM has received funding through NHSE-NIHR predoctoral award to undertake this project. The British Thoracic Society wholly funds the UK Interstitial Lung Disease Registry. The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) provided a starter grant (2011 to 2013). Boehringer Ingelheim and InterMune each provided a grant to support the development of additional electronic features in 2014.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK ILD (Interstitial lung disease) registry has ethical approval (National Research Ethics Service (NRES) reference 12/EE/0381 and renewal 12/EE/0346).This publication makes use of data purchased from the British Thoracic Society Interstitial Lung Disease Registry Programme, which has no responsibility or liability for the accuracy, currency or correctness of this publication. The project was peer reviewed by the BTS prior to release of the data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.