Abstract
Introduction Considering numerous radiological images and the heavy workload of writing corresponding reports in clinical work, it is significant to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to facilitate this process and reduce the burden of radiologists. In the past few years, particularly with the advent of vision language models, some works explored generating radiological reports directly from images. However, despite some efforts demonstrated in previous studies, limitations in AI-generated radiological reports persist. Current research mainly focuses on detecting abnormalities, rather than generating textual reports from medical images. The evidence for AI application in radiological report writing has not been synthesized. This scoping review aims to map the current literature on the engagement of AI-generating radiological reports based on images. Methods and analysis Following a well-established scoping review methodology, five stages are provided: i) determining the research question, ii) searching strategy, iii) inclusion/exclusion criteria, iv) data extraction, and v) results analysis. Four databases will be applied to search peer-reviewed literature from January 2016 to February 2025. A two-stage screening process will be conducted by two independent reviewers to determine the eligibility of articles, and only those regarding AI-generated radiological reports will be included. All data from eligible articles will be extracted and analyzed using narrative and descriptive analyses, presenting in a standard form. Ethic and dissemination Ethic approval is no required in this scoping review. Experts from Hospital of University of Geneva will be consulted to provide professional insight and feedback regarding the study findings and help with dissemination activities in peer-reviewed publications or academic presentations
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by RECHERCHE PATIENTS-PROCESSUS at Hospital of University of Geneva
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos