Abstract
Introduction. Rib fractures result in significant pain that can impair ventilatory function and result in increased rates of respiratory complication. Early effective analgesia is a crucial treatment goal for these patients however, this is often difficult to achieve. Regional anaesthesia techniques have been used as analgesic adjuncts following thoracic trauma to reduce both pain scores and opioid consumption. More recently, the serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae block have been used in the field of Emergency Medicine as an early analgesic adjunct through either a single depot infiltration of local anaesthetic ("single shot") or continuous infusion catheter-based blocks in patients with rib fractures. These single-shot blocks are relatively quick and logistically easy to perform. Within the field of Emergency Medicine, the limitations to performing invasive procedures (like catheter insertion) under strict sterile conditions within an appropriate clinical space makes these single shot techniques a much more viable option. We will conduct a systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) with network meta-analysis to test the effectiveness of these "single shot" regional anaesthesia techniques on early pain reduction in adult patients with rib fractures. Methods and analysis. We will include RCTs that compare a single-shot regional anaesthesia technique for the purpose of rib fracture management to either placebo, a passive comparison (e.g. standard care management with analgesia), or an active comparison (e.g. one block against another, head to head trials). We will perform a search that includes the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CinAHL and CENTRAL plus clinical trial registries. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. We will report study characteristics and quantify risk of bias. We will perform a traditional random-effects meta analysis for each pairwise comparison and if there is sufficient data, network meta analysis will be conducted using a Bayesian approach to simultaneously compare multiple treatments via a common comparator (standard care). We will evaluate overall certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Conclusion. This systematic review and network meta analysis will provide clinicians with an overview of the effectiveness of the "single shot" regional anaesthesia techniques used for early pain reduction in adult patients with rib fractures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The planned systematic review will only use openly available human data that has been originally published in the primary literature, as identified by the disclosed search strategy.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos