Abstract
Ethiopia is among the countries with a well-established community health program also known as a health extension program (HEP) aiming at improving access to basic healthcare services at the community level. The program has achieved remarkable success, significantly improving healthcare access, reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) outcomes, and advancing Ethiopia's progress toward meeting national and global health targets. Despite its success, a national HEP assessment conducted in 2020 showed a decline in health extension workers' performance, low motivation, and gaps in performance management have challenged the program. To enhance motivation, performance, and accountability, and improve service quality, the Ministry of Health integrated Performance-Based Incentive (PBI) intervention into the Electronic Community Health Information System (eCHIS). This implementation research (IR) explored the feasibility, acceptability, and adoption of digitally enabled Performance-Based incentives (PBI). Implementation research (IR), which employed a mixed method design guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework [1]was conducted in three implementations and four control Woredas. The qualitative data collection utilized a semi-structured interview and discussion guides to collect data using focus group discussion, key informant interviews, and small group discussions. Content analysis was used to underpin the qualitative components of the study, and was guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Quantitative data was obtained from eCHIS and DHIS2 dashboards and interrupted time-series analysis and paired t-tests to evaluate changes in maternal and child health services and describe performance of HEWs. The PBI intervention was fully adopted across the intervention Woredas. The HEWs extensively utilized eCHIS for service provision, tracking their performances, reporting, and referrals. Supervisors on the other hand used the enhanced focal person application to set HEWs performance targets, provide supervisory and mentorship support, and monitor the progress of HEWs towards set targets. Adoption of the PBI was facilitated by its alignment with the existing workflow, and intergradation into the routine HEP operations. High acceptability of the intervention was reported due to its transparency, efficiency, and ability to streamline workflows. Digital tools minimized manual tasks and enhanced trust in performance evaluations and efforts to incentivize the best performers. The intervention fostered motivation among HEWs, witnessed by significantly improved KPI scores between the first and second incentive rounds (from 66 to 82, p<0.05). Supervisors and Woreda managers emphasized the intervention's capacity to drive data-driven decision-making and performance monitoring. Feasibility was demonstrated by availing of essential digital tools (tablets, Wi-Fi routers, power banks, and fingerprint scanners), eCHIS capacity-building training, and alignment of strategies with routine health system practices. HEWs reported that the intervention simplified the tracking of performances and target-setting. However, infrastructure limitations, inconsistent mentorship, and high staff turnover were identified barriers to optimal implementation. The digitally enabled PBI intervention proved to be feasible, acceptable, and effective in improving the HEWs' performance and improving RMNCH outcomes. Addressing the issue of infrastructure limitations, availing resources needed for consistently implementing PBI, and institutionalizing the intervention within the routine HEP activities remained crucial.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This implementation research was financially supported by a grant from the Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF) (https://ciff.org/) to JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. (JSI) for the JSI/L10K eCHIS project in Ethiopia, under agreement number G-2102-06118.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical clearance for the study was obtained on June 30, 2022, from the Ethiopian Public Health Association (EPHA) Research Ethics Review Board reference number EPHA/OG/886/22. The protocol was exempted from human subject oversight through JSI Research and Training Institute, Inc. (JSI), USA. Study permits were sought from regional and zonal health departments, Woreda health offices, respective HCs, and HPs. Study participants were informed about the purpose of the study, its benefits, risks, and their right to opt-out. Moreover, participants were given information that their participation was voluntary and the researcher kept the information obtained from them confidential and only shared it with the study team to respect confidentiality and privacy. All interviews were conducted after obtaining respondents' informed verbal consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos