Abstract
Purpose. Healthcare practitioners have shown implicit and explicit attitudes against people with disabilities. This study aimed to examine how these attitudes evolved between 2006 and 2024 across occupation groups and as a function of sex. Methods. Data from 660,430 participants were analyzed, including 20,405 clinicians, 9357 rehabilitation assistants, and 630,668 individuals in other occupations. Implicit attitudes were assessed using D-scores derived from the Disability Implicit Association Test of Project Implicit. Explicit attitudes were assessed using a Likert scale. Generalized additive models were conducted to examine the evolution of attitudes over time. Results. The preference for people without disabilities showed a linear decrease over time. No such effect was found for implicit attitudes. However, non-linear interactions between time, occupation group, and sex suggest a complex effect of time on attitudes that should be interpreted in the context of each specific combination of occupation group and sex, rather than assuming a uniform trend. Attitudes toward people with physical disabilities were less favorable than toward people with general disabilities. Older age was associated with less favorable implicit attitudes and more favorable explicit attitudes toward people with disabilities. Rehabilitation assistants had less favorable implicit attitudes than other occupation groups, while clinicians showed no evidence of a significant difference. In contrast, explicit attitudes were more favorable among rehabilitation assistants but less favorable among clinicians. Conclusions. The contrast between the evolution of implicit and explicit attitudes suggests that implicit bias remains resistant to change despite increased positive consideration and awareness of people with disabilities. Understanding these patterns may inform training programs aimed at reducing bias among healthcare practitioners.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Matthieu P. Boisgontier is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (RGPIN-2021-03153), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI 43661), MITACS, and the Banting Discovery Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Project Implicit was approved by the Institutional Review Board for the Social and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Virginia, USA, and the current study was approved by the University of Ottawa Research Ethics Board (H-02-25-11349), Canada.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.