Abstract
Background: Sodium intake is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet accurately assessing dietary sodium remains challenging due to food composition variability and inaccurate menu labeling. While menu labels are intended to guide consumers, discrepancies between reported and actual sodium content could undermine their effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of menu-declared sodium content in take-away foods by comparing reported values with laboratory measurements. Design: A cross-sectional analysis of 39 take-away food items from 23 outlets in Reading, UK. Sodium content was measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and compared to menu-declared values. Results: Sodium content varied widely across food categories. Median sodium levels ranged from 0.1 g/100g (chips from fish & chips shop) to 1.6 g/100g (pizza), with some meals exceeding the 6 g/day recommended intake in a single serving. Curry dishes exhibited the greatest variability (2.3 - 9.4 g per dish). Significant discrepancies were found between menu-reported and measured sodium levels, with almost 50% of foods exceeding declared values. Conclusion: Take-away foods exhibit substantial sodium variability, and menu labels often fail to accurately reflect actual sodium content. These findings have implications for nutritional epidemiology, where inaccurate sodium estimates may misclassify intake, and for public health, as misleading labels could hinder sodium reduction efforts. Regular validation of menu labels and improved consumer guidance are needed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos