Abstract
Introduction As wildfires become more prevalent, their impact on fertility warrants evaluation. We aimed to examine the impact of smoke exposure on semen analysis (SA) parameters of intrauterine insemination (IUI) patients in the greater Seattle, WA area. We hypothesized that wildfire smoke exposure was associated with a decline in total motile sperm (TMC).
Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of subjects’ SA parameters pre- and post-exposure to 2018, 2020, and 2022 smoke events. Pre-exposure semen was a diagnostic fresh sample while post-exposure was semen taken at IUI. If subjects had multiple IUIs during the smoke event, only their first IUI was evaluated. We performed analyses with R (Auckland, NZ) using linear mixed-effects modeling (significance of p < 0.05) with subject and event year as a random effect to account for temporal variations in smoke severity.
Results We identified 84 subjects who underwent IUI across the 2018, 2020, and 2022 wildfire smoke events. Median time between initial SA and SA for IUI was 4 months. We observed a decline in sperm concentration, total motile sperm, and total progressively motile sperm. We also observed an increase in percent progressively motile sperm. These trends did not differ across year.
Conclusions Our results are consistent with a prior small study demonstrating that wildfire smoke exposure is associated with adverse sperm quality. These findings highlight the need for further research on the effects of wildfire smoke exposure on human sperm and fertility treatments, especially as smoke exposures are expected to increase with climate change.
Highlights
Minimal research exists on the impact of wildfire smoke on male fertility
We demonstrate that wildfire smoke exposure is associated with a decline in sperm concentration, total sperm count, and total motile sperm count across three separate wildfire events
Our findings corroborate those of one small cohort study completed in another geographic location
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was funded by the University of Washington Medicine Endowed Professorship for Men's Health (Dr. Thomas J. Walsh), the Urology Care Foundation Research Scholar Award (Dr. Tristan M. Nicholson), and the National Institute Of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K12ES033584 and P30ES007033. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The REDCap instance in this research is funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number UL1TR002319.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Board Review of the University of Washington gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos