Abstract
According to World Health Organization, about 5% of adults globally suffer from clinical depression, and in India it is about 4.5% of people. Oral medication is a common treatment against depression. However, more than half of those treated do not respond to the pharmacological treatment strategy in the first trial and may require switching or augmentation with other medications. There is a strong need for precise models for arriving at a personalized treatment strategy in a sooner timeline. Some earlier models using clinical information along with electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed good performance for early predicting treatment outcome in depression. However, the critical features identified by those studies including the presence of differential frontal theta power and frontal alpha asymmetry in depression patients has been challenged in the recent times due to contradictions in interpretability and robustness: when the theta and alpha frequency signals were teased apart from their aperiodic component, the resulting periodic components were not robust for prediction. On the other hand, gut abnormality in depression has been reported by many earlier studies but have not been used for predictive or prognosis purposes in depression. Our study aims are twofold: first to identify the features that can early predict treatment outcome, and interpret them for different patient subgroups, and second to understand the utility of longitudinal data collection and gut-brain interactions to predicting treatment outcome. About 161 participants (naive patients = 99) registered for our longitudinal study spanning three visits, and our aim was to investigate whether visits 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (in 7-10 days) could predict the antidepressant treatment outcome in visit 3 (after 30 days). After attrition, electroencephalography and electrogastrography data from 89 participants were collected in visit 2 (patients = 42), and 61 in visit 3 (patients = 21). We used electrophysiological features in the brain and the gut along with clinical data to train simple predictive models, and it was able to reliably predict non-response to depression medications with specificity 78% and sensitivity 84%. The significant features explaining the treatment outcome were ranked, altogether offering a scalable, whole body cognition tool for clinicians for guiding their medication strategy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by initiation and seed grants, BIRAC (Department of Science and Technology, India) grant to PPB
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.