Abstract
Obesity is a global health challenge associated with increased risk of co-morbidity and mortality. Existing government policies have failed to adequately address obesity. Mapping obesity policy actions (including prevention initiatives and weight-management services (WMS)) using behavioural science can offer insights into how approaches to prevention/management could be improved.
This research aimed to identify strengths and gaps in adult obesity policy actions/WMS in Northern Ireland (NI) by conducting a systematic scoping review of grey literature. Obesity policy actions/WMS were mapped out and coded using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW), then assessed against obesity risk factors identified from the Foresight Obesity System Map.
The breadth of obesity policy actions/WMS was mapped using Google Advanced Searches, grey literature database searches, targeted website searches and stakeholder consultations. Policy actions/WMS were categorised using the UK weight-management tiered system. Policy actions/WMS were coded by BCW intervention type. Foresight variables were coded according to the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) Model. Policy actions/WMS were subsequently mapped against Foresight variables and displayed using a heat map.
Twelve Google Advanced Searches, three database searches, n=17 targeted website searches and three stakeholder interviews were conducted (and updated in 2024) identifying a wide range of relevant records (N=127). Results included policies/strategies/guidelines/campaigns/services targeting weight management/obesity.
Of the identified policy actions/WMS, 72% were classified as tier 1 (health promotion); 21% tier 2 (community-based weight management programmes); 2% tier 3 (specialist obesity services), 5% were tier 2/3 services and 0% were tier 4 services (metabolic surgery). Education and persuasion were the most commonly coded intervention types from the BCW, followed by enablement and training. Environmental restructuring was limited, as was modelling and incentivisation approaches.
Behavioural mapping of obesity policy actions/WMS is a novel approach with the potential to influence policy/service development. In NI, using this method illustrated policy gaps and significant opportunities to improve WMS provision.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Queens University Faculty Research Ethics Committee
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.