Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of dementia poses significant challenges for emergency department (ED) care, as persons living with dementia (PLWD) more frequently experience adverse outcomes such as delirium, prolonged stays, and higher mortality rates. Despite advancements in care strategies, a critical gap remains in understanding how ED interventions impact outcomes in this vulnerable population. This systematic review aims to identify evidence-based ED care interventions tailored to PLWD to improve outcomes.
Methods A systematic review was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus (Elsevier), and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global through September 2024. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024586555). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and quality improvement initiatives focused on ED interventions for PLWD. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, ED revisits, functional decline, and mortality.
Results From 3,305 screened studies, six met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included nonpharmacologic therapies (e.g., music and light therapy), specialized geriatric ED units, and assessment tools, such as for pain. Tailored interventions including geriatric emergency units and community paramedic care transitions were effective in reducing 30-day ED revisits and hospitalizations. However, heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate.
Conclusion This review underscores the urgent need for standardized and evidence-based interventions in ED settings for PLWD. Approaches including multidisciplinary care models and non-pharmacologic therapies demonstrated potential for improving outcomes. Future research should prioritize consistent outcome measures, interdisciplinary collaboration, and person-centered care strategies to enhance the quality and equity of ED services for PLWD.
Key Points
Tailored interventions such as geriatric ED units and community paramedic care transitions significantly reduce ED revisits and hospital admissions among persons living with dementia.
Non-pharmacologic therapies, including music and light interventions, show potential for improving patient outcomes, though results are heterogeneous and require further validation.
The review highlights the urgent need for standardized protocols and interdisciplinary approaches to enhance emergency care for this vulnerable population.
Why does this paper matter?This paper addresses critical knowledge gaps concerning emergency care for persons living with dementia, offering evidence-based insights to improve outcomes and guide the development of standardized, person-centered interventions in ED settings.
Competing Interest Statement
CRC receives funding as co-Investigator of the Geriatric Emergency Department Collaborative and Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (R33 AG058926 and R33 AG0698022). SWL, SL received support from John A. Hartford/West Health.
Funding Statement
West health, John A Hartford foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
PubMed.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Michelle.Suh{at}bsd.uchicago.edu, luna.ragsdale{at}va.gov, justine.seidenfeld{at}va.gov, james.vanoppen{at}nhs.net, lauren.lapointe-shaw{at}uhn.ca, caroldalvarenga{at}yahoo.com.br, James.Jaramillo{at}quinnipiac.edu, annie.wescott{at}northwestern.edu, kaihouhirata{at}gmail.com, mkennedy8{at}mgb.org, lauren.cameron-comasco{at}corewellhealth.org, carpenter.christopher{at}mayo.edu, thogan{at}uchicagomedicine.org, sliu1{at}mgh.harvard.edu
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CRC receives funding as co-Investigator of the Geriatric Emergency Department Collaborative and Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (R33 AG058926 and R33 AG0698022). SWL, SL received support from John A. Hartford/West Health.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos