Work Requirements and Health: Projected Mortality Impacts of Medicaid Coverage Loss

Recent proposals by congressional leaders to impose work requirements on Medicaid eligibility could jeopardize access to health care for 36.2 million Americans.¹Many of those who will be affected already face significant socioeconomic challenges and a disproportionate disease burden, raising concerns that coverage losses would exacerbate health issues for those most in need.

The proposed work requirements mandate at least 80 hours of paid work or other qualifying activities (such as job training or community service) each month for most Medicaid enrollees aged 18 to 65.¹ Proponents contend that these policies encourage employment and reduce public spending. However, evidence suggests that the majority of Medicaid enrollees already work.² Additionally² these regulations impose administrative burdens and unnecessary overhead costs for the taxpayer. Furthermore, the retractions will interrupt chronic care for many, potentially leading to more severe and expensive health outcomes. Onerous reporting processes and administrative hurdles risk disenrollment even for those meeting work requirements or qualifying for exemptions. These challenges are compounded for enrollees with limited digital literacy, unstable work schedules, or difficulty navigating bureaucratic systems.³

Attempts at such requirements in Arkansas and New Hampshire illustrate how counter-productive these policies are. In Arkansas, for example, 25% of enrollees lost Medicaid coverage within the first six months. Furthermore, 89% of those losing coverage remained unenrolled after a year, often citing confusion about reporting rules and difficulties accessing the online portal.⁴ Similarly, New Hampshire suspended work requirements when it became apparent that thousands of individuals were at risk of losing coverage due to reporting bureaucracy.⁵ These examples highlight the potential for rapid, widespread disenrollment with long-lasting health ramifications.

To project the nationwide public health repercussions of this policy change, we applied methodology from our previous study.⁶ Specifically, we projected excess annual deaths in two scenarios of ensuing insurance coverage loss. The first scenario models 22.3% of the 36.2 million at-risk enrollees losing coverage, reflecting the Arkansas experience.⁴ The second scenario models all 36.2 million at-risk individuals losing coverage.¹

We first updated insurance coverage estimates among the affected population aged 19 to 64 years, incorporating the number of individuals who could become uninsured due to Medicaid work requirements. We then applied the elevated mortality risk⁷ associated with lack of insurance to estimate the resulting number of excess deaths (supplementary appendix). We incorporated the empirical uncertainties associated with the hazard risk for mortality as well as current insurance coverage to generate uncertainty intervals around our estimates for excess deaths.

Under a scenario modeled after Arkansas’s Medicaid work requirement experience—where 22.3% of enrollees lost coverage—we estimate 11,825 excess deaths annually nationwide [95% Uncertainty Interval (UI): 2,421–24,367]. If all 36.2 million at-risk individuals lose coverage, the projected annual excess deaths rise to 53,144 [95% UI 10,880–109,513]. These figures underscore the catastrophic public health consequences of imposing federal Medicaid work requirements.

In light of these findings, policies aimed at promoting workforce participation should be carefully balanced with the importance of maintaining health insurance continuity, and the logistical costs and implementation challenges. These findings highlight the public health consequences of Medicaid work requirements. Legislators should carefully consider these mortality impacts when evaluating such policies.