Abstract
Background: International funding for HIV has been critical in reducing new HIV transmissions and deaths. Five countries providing over 90% of international HIV funding announced reductions in international aid of 10%–70% between 2025–2026, with the US government ceasing aid on 20–January–2025. We investigated the potential impact of these funding reductions on HIV incidence and mortality through mathematical modelling. Methods: We used 26 country–validated Optima HIV models (Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bhutan, Cambodia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Eswatini, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Malaysia, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Zimbabwe). HIV incidence and mortality were projected across 2025–2030 for a status–quo scenario (most recent HIV spending continued) and scenarios capturing the impact of anticipated international aid reductions for HIV prevention and testing; plus additional impact on treatment and facility–based testing resulting from immediate discontinuation of President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) support. Country–specific impacts were estimated using sources of country–reported HIV funding. We extrapolated scenario outcomes to all low– and middle–income countries based on the modelled proportion of globally reported international aid by source (49% overall, 54% PEPFAR). Upper and lower bounds reflected different mitigation and absorption assumptions. Findings: Across all low– and middle–income countries, anticipated 24% (weighted average) international aid reductions plus discontinued PEPFAR support could cause an additional 4∙43–10∙75 million new HIV infections and 0∙77–2∙93 million HIV-related deaths between 2025–2030 compared with the status-quo. If PEPFAR support could be reinstated or equivalently recovered, this reduced to 0∙07–1∙73 million additional new HIV infections and 0∙005–0∙06 million HIV-related deaths. Impacts were greatest in countries with a higher percentage of international funding and those with increasing incidence among key populations. Interpretation: Unmitigated funding reductions could significantly reverse progress in the HIV response by 2030, disproportionately affecting sub-Saharan African countries and key and vulnerable populations. Sustainable financing mechanisms are critical to ensure people have continued access to HIV prevention, testing, and treatment programs, thereby reducing new infections and deaths. Funding: None.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Country models utilized in this project have been financially supported by the Gates Foundation, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis, UNAIDS and World Health Organization (WHO).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.