STRUCTURED ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION We investigated the feasibility of remote longitudinal research using wearable devices and smartphone applications to record sleep and cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia.
METHODS Older adults with MCI or dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or Lewy body disease (LBD) and cognitively healthy participants completed at-home sleep and circadian monitoring (digital sleep diaries, actigraphy, wearable sleep electroencephalography (EEG), saliva samples) and digital cognitive assessments for 8 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, and data completeness.
RESULTS 41 participants consented (10 AD, 11 LBD, and 20 controls) and 40 completed the 8-week study. Data completeness for sleep EEG was 91% and ranged from 79% to 97% for all remote tasks. 12/40 (30%) participants reported receiving external support with completing study tasks.
DISCUSSION Longitudinal multimodal sleep and cognitive profiling using novel technology is feasible in older adults with MCI and dementia and healthy older adults.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. EC has received funding from Biogen, Eisai, and Lilly for consultancy and providing educational resources.
Funding Statement
The RESTED study was funded by charitable organisations (BRACE, Alzheimer's Research UK, the Bristol & Weston Hospitals Charity (previously Above & Beyond), and the David Telling Charitable Trust), the NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, and philanthropic donations from S. Scobie and A. Graham. JB also received funding from Alzheimer's Research UK (ARUK) supported by the Margaret Jost Fellowship and the Don Thoburn Memorial Scholarship. The funders had no role in the trial design, patient recruitment, data collection, analysis, interpretation, nor in writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Ethics Committee of Yorkshire and the Humber - Bradford Leeds gave ethical approval for this work on behalf of the Health Research Authority (reference 21/YH/0177).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Contributorship statement:
VGG: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Software, Project administration, Resources, Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualisation, Writing – Original draft preparation, Writing – Review & editing. JB: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – Review & editing, Funding acquisition. HDM: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & editing, Funding acquisition. HL: Investigation, Project administration, Formal analysis. AK: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal analysis. NT: Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing – Review & editing. RG: Conceptualisation, Funding acquisition. BB: Methodology. EC: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos