Abstract
While medication intake is common among pregnant women, medication safety remains underexplored, leading to unclear guidance for patients and healthcare professionals. PregMedNet addresses this gap by providing a multifaceted maternal medication safety framework based on systematic analysis of 1.19 million mother-baby dyads from U.S. claims databases. A novel confounding adjustment pipeline was applied to systematically control confounders for multiple medication-disease pairs, robustly identifying both known and novel maternal medication effects.
Notably, one of the newly discovered associations was experimentally validated, demonstrating the reliability of claims data and machine learning for perinatal medication safety studies. Additionally, potential biological mechanisms of newly identified associations were generated using a graph learning method. These findings highlight PregMedNet’s value in promoting safer medication use during pregnancy and maternal-neonatal outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
N.A. is a cofounder of Takeoff AI, a member of the scientific advisory boards of January AI, Parallel Bio, Celine Therapeutics, and WellSim Biomedical Technologies, and a paid consultant for MaraBio Systems. B.G. is an advisory board member at SurgeCare. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
Data for this project were accessed using the Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences Data Core. The PHS Data Core is supported by a National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Science Clinical and Translational Science Award (UL1TR003142) and from Internal Stanford funding. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Certain data were supplied by Merative as part of one or more MarketScan Research Databases. Any analysis, interpretation, or conclusion based on these data is solely that of the authors and not Merative.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institute of Review Board (IRB) at Stanford University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos