Abstract
Purpose Childhood obesity inequalities in England persist despite targeted interventions focused on promoting healthy diets and food environments. This study, part of the Family Food Experience Study-London, aimed to investigate the impact of deprivation and neighbourhood food environments on home food environments, parental feeding practices, child eating behaviours, food preferences, and child BMI.
Methods Families (n=728) with primary school-aged children were recruited from four socioeconomically diverse London boroughs in 2022. Data were collected through computer-assisted interviews (30.8% in-person, 69.2% telephone) on home food environment, parental feeding practices, and children’s eating behaviours and food preferences. Deprivation was characterised using a composite measure of family and neighbourhood indicators of socioeconomic position. Neighbourhood food environment exposures were derived from individualised activity spaces. Child BMI was measured objectively. Generalised linear models examined associations between deprivation and neighbourhood food environment with family food-related outcomes, adjusting for school-level clustering, child sex, age and ethnicity.
Results Greater neighbourhood deprivation was significantly associated with more ‘obesogenic’ family food practices, child eating behaviours and child BMI. Deprivation was linked to higher food responsiveness (β=-0.12, p=0.002), emotional overeating (β=-0.11, p <0.001), and increased desire to drink (β=-0.26, p <0.001). Parents in deprived households used more emotional (β=-0.10, p<0.05), instrumental (β=-0.11, p=0.003) and pressuring feeding practices (β=-0.14, p<0.001). Greater deprivation was also associated with a more obesogenic home food environment (β=-0.19, p<0.001) and lower meal structure (β= 0.17, p<0.001). Exposure to less healthy neighbourhood food environments around and between home and school were associated with a more obesogenic home food environment (β=-0.07, p<0.01), but no significant associations were found with feeding practices or child eating behaviours or child BMI.
Conclusions Family deprivation, rather than neighbourhood food environments, is more strongly linked to obesogenic feeding practices, child eating behaviours and child BMI. Policies focusing on improving neighbourhood food environments will likely be most effective if combined with those addressing systemic issues related to deprivation such as welfare policies (e.g. reforms to benefit caps) or targeted subsidies for healthy food. Future research should examine the independent and accumulative impact that environment and household interventions have on childhood obesity inequalities.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIHR Family Food Experience Study London (NIHR129771)/Public Health Research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving research study participants received ethical approval from City, University of London, School of Health & Psychological Sciences Ethics Committee (ID 2021-0367 & ID2021-1377).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* denotes joint first authors
Funding: This study was funded by NIHR Family Food Experience Study – London (NIHR129771)/Public Health Research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos