Abstract
Background Contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent mothers can prevent repeat pregnancy with positive implications for their health, education, and economic prospects. Few studies have examined the prevalence and correlates of contraceptive uptake among adolescent mothers in sub-Saharan Africa. Our study examines contraceptive use, its correlates, and reasons for non-use of contraception among adolescent mothers (aged 12-19) in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and Blantyre, Malawi.
Methodology The data analyzed for this study were part of a larger cross-sectional survey on the lived experiences of pregnant and parenting girls. For this study, we limited our analysis to 628 (Ouagadougou) and 500 (Blantyre) adolescent mothers who were neither pregnant nor trying to get pregnant. We randomly selected urban and rural enumeration areas (EAs) in the study settings, conducted household listing, and identified eligible participants whom we interviewed. We used interviewer-administered questionnaires to obtain information on contraceptive awareness, use, and reason for non-use and analyzed the data using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results Knowledge of contraceptive methods is nearly universal among parenting girls, and the contraceptive prevalence was higher than the national average in both study settings. Single adolescent mothers were significantly less likely to be currently using any contraceptive methods (AOR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.93 in Burkina Faso vs. AOR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50-0.71 in Malawi) or any modern methods (AOR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.49-0.90 in Burkina Faso vs. AOR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.46-0.66 in Malawi) compared to their married counterparts in both countries. Adolescent mothers aged 19 were more likely to be current users of any contraceptives compared to those aged 16 or younger in Burkina Faso (AOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.07-2.26) and were also more likely to have ever used any methods in Malawi (AOR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07-1.53). Infrequent sex (Malawi, 64.9%; Burkina |Faso, 36.6%) was the main reason for contraceptive non-use though fear of side-effects (17.7%) and religious prohibition (16.6%) also stood out.
Conclusion A substantial proportion of adolescent mothers, especially single and younger adolescents, are not using any contraceptive methods or relying on less effective methods. These results underscore the need for more interventions targeting adolescent mothers with accurate information on contraceptive methods. These interventions should address the religious objection to contraceptives in Burkina Faso and infrequent sex in Malawi.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
APHRC Internal Scientific Review Board REF DOR/2021/005 Burkina Faso Ministry of Health and Ministry Higher Education and Scientific Research Ethics Committee for Health Research #2021-04-090 University of Malawi Research Ethics Committee REF P.12/20/42
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos