Abstract
Background The high incidence of non-specific neck pain (NSNP) among students, commonly associated with prolonged sedentary behavior and extensive use of electronic devices, highlights the need to assess its impact on cognitive and motor functions. This study aims to evaluate the effects of NSNP on dual-task performance by analyzing gait parameters and cognitive performance during both single-task and dual-task conditions.
Methods Forty-five participants with NSNP and forty-five age-matched controls were assessed using an optical motion-capture system. Participants underwent gait assessments during both single-task (without cognitive load) and dual-task conditions, in which the cognitive tasks involved simple mathematical computations.
Results Results revealed that, under single-task conditions, differences in gait parameters between groups were not statistically significant. However, under dual-task conditions, participants with NSNP exhibited significant impairments in gait parameters and higher cognitive costs (p < 0.05). Correlation analysis indicated that pain intensity was significantly associated with cognitive cost and gait parameter alterations during dual-task conditions (p < 0.05).
Conclusions These findings suggest that NSNP significantly elevates the cognitive effort required during dual tasking. These finding emphasizes on the need for interventions to alleviate neck pain and improve both physical and cognitive health.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the College of Health Sciences at the University of Sharjah. The ethical approval number for this research is REC-23-05-11-03-S. All participants provided written informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study, and the research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos