Abstract
Background Menstrual hygiene management is a challenge for girls and women in Ghana due to a lack of access to affordable menstrual products, water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities, inadequate menstrual health education; and social stigma surrounding menstruation. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of various stakeholders and identify strategies for improving menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) among adolescent girls.
Methods We recruited stakeholders for focus group discussions (FGDs) from basic schools (primary and junior high, grades 1-9) in Hohoe, Volta Region, Ghana. We conducted FGDs with adolescent boys (n=60), parents (n=48), and gatekeepers (n=19). Semi-structured guides were developed and used during FGDs, recorded and supplemented by field notes. Transcripts were thematically analyzed using MAXQDA 2024 software (1).
Results The themes identified were menstrual health management, perceptions and understanding of menstruation, social and cultural practices, and education and awareness. The following strategies were identified: 1) the need for adequate wash facilities, 2) the need to address stigma associated with MHH, 3) the need to reduce the cost of sanitary materials, and 4) the need for improved menstrual health education.
Conclusion These results confirm that cultural stigmas, inadequate facilities, and financial constraints still exist. These act as key barriers to MHH for schoolgirls in Hohoe, Ghana. To support girls’ health, dignity, and education, recommendations include inclusive education programs, improved WASH facilities, and affordable and/or sustainable menstrual products.
What is already known on this topic?Menstrual hygiene remains a significant issue in Ghana, with challenges such as a lack of affordable menstrual products, inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities, limited menstrual health education, and pervasive stigma.
What this study adds This study uniquely incorporates perspectives from multiple stakeholders, including adolescent boys, parents, and gatekeepers (teachers, school health coordinators, and school community leaders), to provide an all-inclusive understanding of MHH barriers and strategies to address them. The study reveals a shift in cultural practices, with modernization eroding some traditions but perpetuating stigma through religious and social norms, which continue to isolate menstruating girls and women.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The findings support policy recommendations to reduce financial barriers to menstrual products, including tax elimination or subsidies, and to invest in school infrastructure upgrades. Future research and interventions can build on this study’s insights to develop context-specific, gendersensitive, and sustainable approaches to improving MHH.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received $5,000 from a Tom Hall Education Grant, Consortium for Universities in Global Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research Protection Program of Michigan State University gave ethical approval for this work ((Study ID: MOD00007866). The University of Health and Allied Sciences Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work (Study ID: UHAS-REC A.6 l2l23-24).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.