Abstract
Pertussis remains an enigma partly due to the uncertain impact of asymptomatic cases on transmission. Contributing to this knowledge gap is a lack of high-quality disease surveillance, particularly in those low- and middle-income countries that experience high disease burdens. Here we present analyses based on our prospective longitudinal surveillance of a rolling cohort of 1,315 mothers and their newborn infants in Lusaka, Zambia across 2015 (8,704 unique study visits). We detail the timing, duration, and intensity of qPCR-based IS481 signals in individual subjects and within mother/infant dyads. We find that IS481 signal strength: A) in mothers predicts contemporaneous and future IS481 detections in infants, B) in infants predicts, to a lesser extent, detections in mothers, and C) predicts respiratory symptoms in infants but not mothers. We profile a subgroup of 50 infants and 54 mothers who displayed evidence of persistent colonization (median duration 8 weeks) wherein most mothers were entirely asymptomatic. We also include a critical assessment of qPCR test reliability across IS481 signal strengths. Our results indicate that pertussis transmission routinely occurs between minimally symptomatic mothers and their newborn infants, and demonstrate the routine occurrence of long-duration, mild and minimally symptomatic pertussis infections.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the NIH (R01AI133080) and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1105094).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data for this analysis came from the Southern African Mother Infant Pertussis study (SAMIPS), which received ethical approval from the ERES converge IRB in Lusaka, and the IRB at Boston University Medical Center. The current analysis uses a de-identified data set at the request of the NIH for the R01 grant that supported this work. The current data sets contains no personally identifiable information.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.