Abstract
Objective To determine whether Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) integrity is different between young adults with and without car sickness, To assess the effect of gender on VOR integrity in young adults with and without car sickness and To compare postural stability across different levels of physical activity in young adults with and without car sickness.
Design Cross-sectional study
Setting General community
Participants Forty-six healthy young adult men and women (ages 20-40 years) with and without car sickness
Main Outcome measures Bertec Vision Advantage (BVA) was used to assess VOR integrity, computerized dynamic posturography with immersion virtual reality(CDP-IVR) was used to assess postural stability and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) was used to assess physical activity.
Results Among females, there was no significant difference in BVA outcomes between the car sickness and no car sickness groups (p>0.05, Table 2), In males, there was no significant difference in median (Inter quartile range (IQR) outcomes by study group except for DVA lines lost. Male participants in the car sickness group had more lines lost compared to males in the no car sickness group.
Conclusion Our findings showed that male participants with car sickness appeared to have a weaker VOR compared to females. Also, we found no significant interaction between physical activity and postural stability in young adults with and without car sickness. Future studies should consider assessing postural stability in the sitting position to better replicate the functional position of driving.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Loma Linda University Institutional review board LLUH IRB approval number: 5230167 Written consent was obtained for this project
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
- CMS
- Chronic motion sensitivity
- BVA
- Bertec vision advantage
- CDP-IVR
- Computerized dynamic posturography with immersion virtual reality
- VOR
- Vestibulo-ocular reflex
- MSSQ-SF
- Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire-Short Form
- IPAQ-SF
- International Physical Activity Questionnaire
- BLVA
- Baseline visual acuity
- VPT
- Visual processing time
- DVAT
- Dynamic visual acuity test
- GST
- Gaze stability test
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.