Abstract
Extracting and detecting viral RNA in wastewater has proven to be a rapid and cost-effective approach for community-level monitoring during the recent global Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Various sample concentrating methods, such as centrifugal ultrafiltration, have been utilized in wastewater SARS-CoV-2 detection studies. However, freeze drying, a promising technique commonly used for concentrating and preserving various biological samples, has yet to be explored in this field. This study compared the performance of freeze-drying and the widely used centrifugal ultrafiltration method in terms of recovery rate, detection limit, and other key parameters for concentrating 72 wastewater samples collected from four facilities in El Paso, TX. Statistical analyses revealed that the freeze-drying method demonstrated higher overall recovery efficiency (20.33% vs 13.00%), a superior detection ratio (68.4% vs. 31.6%), and lower detection limits (0.06copies/mL vs 0.35copis/mL) than centrifugal ultrafiltration, particularly during the early stages of the pandemic. Despite its longer processing time than centrifugal ultrafiltration, freeze-drying offers several notable advantages, including eliminating pretreatment steps, providing flexible sample storage options, preventing signal loss and sample degradation, and reducing labor and exposure risks. Freeze-drying also does not require intensive training for concentrating sewage water. These benefits, combined with its efficient capture of viral RNA, position freeze-drying as a promising alternative for wastewater virus detection, especially in resource-constrained lab settings at local wastewater treatment plants. The protocol and findings reported here provide a baseline for further development of freeze-drying-based methods for enabling community-level early warning and surveillance against emerging viral threats in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work received funding from the College of Science, University of Texas at El Paso. The work has used instruments in the Border Biomedical Research Center (BBRC) that is supported by the National Institutes on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number U54MD007592. Special thanks go to BBRC personnel Georgialina Rodriguez and Ana P. Betancourt who helped us use the instruments. RD and CX also received support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of NIH under award number R01GM129525 and from the Welch Foundation under Grant Number AH-2126-20220331. WYL received support from NIGMS of NIH under award number SC1CA245675. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
