Abstract
Resilience to stressors has emerged as a major gerontological concept aiming to promote more positive outcomes for older adults. Achieving this aim relies on determining mechanisms underlying capacity to respond resiliently. This paper seeks proof of principle for the hypothesis that physical aspects of said capacity are rooted in the fitness of one’s physiology governing stress response, conceptualized as a dynamical system.
The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging (“SPRING”) leveraged stimulus-response experiments to characterize physiological fitness in older adults scheduled for one of three major stressors: Total knee replacement, incident hemodialysis, or bone marrow transplant in hematological cancer. Here we analyze Holter monitor time series, cortisol responses to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation, and repeated diurnal salivary cortisol assessment in the SPRING pilot (n=79). Principal components analysis was applied anticipating steady-state and “adaptation” mechanisms underlying the repeated physiological measures. Analytic features evidenced these mechanisms, supporting construct validity. Component scores were analyzed by major stressor, hypothesized surrogate physiologic measures (physical frailty phenotype, self-report of health), and demographic, health and behavioral characteristics. Scores differed substantially by stressor type and the surrogate physiologic measures, evidencing criterion validity.
Our data support that HRV, ACTH and salivary cortisol stimulus-response data jointly assess adaptation capacity across a variety of major stressors. We believe that SPRING is the first study in humans to concurrently query multiple physiologic systems using stimulus-response tests. Our findings lay groundwork for future validation with further data and to better forecast resilience of older adults to clinical stressors.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability
The SPRING is ongoing. Data will be shared according to the NIH-approved sharing plan for the study; in short, data requests will be reviewed on a per-case basis once primary study analyses have been completed.
